Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/icp: Add backlight Support for ICP
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:25:24 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516386324.2673.56.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180119175602.rf724rdq2z4vqdxi@intel.com>

Em Sex, 2018-01-19 às 09:56 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 05:26:02PM +0000, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:40:41PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > > Em Qui, 2018-01-11 às 15:57 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:48:57PM +0000, James Ausmus wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 04:00:08PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > > > > > From: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ICP has two backlight controllers - similar to previous
> > > > > > platforms
> > > > > > like
> > > > > > BXT.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > v2: Remove the usage of ICP_SECOND_PPS_BACKLIGHT
> > > > > > register.(Jani)
> > > > > > Reuse BXT code since it is very similar.(Ville)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > v3 (from Paulo): Rebase.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 2 +-
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> > > > > > index fa6831f8c004..ad80cca8c110 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> > > > > > @@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@
> > > > > > intel_panel_init_backlight_funcs(struct
> > > > > > intel_panel *panel)
> > > > > >  		panel->backlight.set = bxt_set_backlight;
> > > > > >  		panel->backlight.get = bxt_get_backlight;
> > > > > >  		panel->backlight.hz_to_pwm =
> > > > > > bxt_hz_to_pwm;
> > > > > > -	} else if (HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
> > > > > > +	} else if (HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv) ||
> > > > > > HAS_PCH_ICP(dev_priv)) {
> > > > > 
> > > > > The commit message says reuse BXT, but the code says reuse
> > > > > CNP -
> > > > > which
> > > > > one should it be?
> > > > 
> > > > well,
> > > > CNP is like BXT, but with only one controller.
> > > > ICP is like BXT, including 2 controllers.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know if it makes more sense re-use the cnp or bxt
> > > > functions
> > > > 
> > > > But one way or another we have to address these lines from
> > > > cnp_setup:
> > > > 
> > > >  /*
> > > >          * CNP has the BXT implementation of backlight, but
> > > > with only
> > > >          * one controller. Future platforms could have multiple
> > > > controll\
> > > > ers
> > > >          * so let's make this extensible and prepared for the
> > > > future.
> > > >          */
> > > >         panel->backlight.controller = 0;
> > > 
> > > My understanding is that we're only using one of the controllers
> > > on ICP
> > > on purpose, so we can perfectly reuse the CNP code.
> > > 
> > > But I'll let Anusha comment on this.
> > 
> > This is intentional. Commit message is trying to tell the
> > similarity 
> > in backlight support. But we need to reuse CNP code ultimstely.
> 
> So it is probably better to update this comment here
> explaining that we know it has more than 1 controller but
> we intentionally only use the '0' one.

I think the cnp_setup_backlight comment is appropriate as-is because
we're still only using one controller for ICP. We should probably only
update it if we start using ICP's second controller (because we never
tested controller 1 and we don't know if the code is actually 100%
prepared for the future). Do you have any specific suggestions on what
to write here?

> 
> But my question now is why?

Pretty much because there's no use for it for now.

> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Anusha 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >  		panel->backlight.setup =
> > > > > > cnp_setup_backlight;
> > > > > >  		panel->backlight.enable =
> > > > > > cnp_enable_backlight;
> > > > > >  		panel->backlight.disable =
> > > > > > cnp_disable_backlight;
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.14.3
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > 
> > -- 
> > Anusha Srivatsa
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-11 18:00 [PATCH 0/8] ICP initial support Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/cnl: Add Port F definition Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-11 19:37   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/icl: Add initial Icelake definitions Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/icp: Introduce Ice Lake PCH Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/icp: Get/set proper Raw clock frequency on ICP Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/icp: Add Panel Power Sequencing Support Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/icp: Add backlight Support for ICP Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-11 21:48   ` James Ausmus
2018-01-11 23:57     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-01-19 16:40       ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-19 17:26         ` Anusha Srivatsa
2018-01-19 17:56           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-01-19 18:25             ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2018-01-19 18:45               ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2018-01-19 18:14           ` James Ausmus
2018-01-19 18:48   ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-19 19:45     ` Ausmus, James
2018-01-19 19:56     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/icp: add ICP gmbus and gpio support Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/icp: Add the ID for ICL PCH - ICP Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-11 18:25 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for ICP initial support Patchwork
2018-01-11 19:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-01-19 19:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for ICP initial support (rev2) Patchwork
2018-01-19 20:20 ` [PATCH 0/8] ICP initial support Paulo Zanoni
2018-01-20  3:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for ICP initial support (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1516386324.2673.56.camel@intel.com \
    --to=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=anusha.srivatsa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox