From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: vathsala nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:58:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1527019137.2226.12.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526979431-716-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 14:27 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> From: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
>
> Prints live state of psr1.Extending the existing
> PSR2 live state function to cover psr1.
>
> Tested on KBL with psr2 and psr1 panel.
>
> v2: rebase
> v3: DK
> Rename psr2_live_status to psr_source_status
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> ------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 5251544..e4a2f15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2596,25 +2596,42 @@ static int i915_guc_log_relay_release(struct
> inode *inode, struct file *file)
> .release = i915_guc_log_relay_release,
> };
>
> -static const char *psr2_live_status(u32 val)
> -{
> - static const char * const live_status[] = {
> - "IDLE",
> - "CAPTURE",
> - "CAPTURE_FS",
> - "SLEEP",
> - "BUFON_FW",
> - "ML_UP",
> - "SU_STANDBY",
> - "FAST_SLEEP",
> - "DEEP_SLEEP",
> - "BUF_ON",
> - "TG_ON"
> - };
> -
> - val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> - if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> - return live_status[val];
> +static const char *psr_source_status(u32 val, bool is_psr2_enabled)
Please change this to psr_source_status(drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> + if (is_psr2_enabled) {
> + static const char * const live_status[] = {
> + "IDLE",
> + "CAPTURE",
> + "CAPTURE_FS",
> + "SLEEP",
> + "BUFON_FW",
> + "ML_UP",
> + "SU_STANDBY",
> + "FAST_SLEEP",
> + "DEEP_SLEEP",
> + "BUF_ON",
> + "TG_ON"
> + };
With that, you can
live_status = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS);
> + val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> + EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> + if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> + return live_status[val];
> + } else {
> + static const char * const live_status[] = {
> + "IDLE",
> + "SRDONACK",
> + "SRDENT",
> + "BUFOFF",
> + "BUFON",
> + "AUXACK",
> + "SRDOFFACK",
> + "SRDENT_ON",
> + };
live_status = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_STATUS);
> + val = (val & EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> + EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> + if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> + return live_status[val];
> + }
>
> return "unknown";
> }
> @@ -2647,6 +2664,7 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file
> *m, void *data)
> enum pipe pipe;
> bool enabled = false;
> bool sink_support;
> + u32 psr_status;
>
> if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -2714,12 +2732,12 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct
> seq_file *m, void *data)
>
> seq_printf(m, "Performance_Counter: %u\n", psrperf);
> }
> - if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> - u32 psr2 = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS);
>
> - seq_printf(m, "EDP_PSR2_STATUS: %x [%s]\n",
> - psr2, psr2_live_status(psr2));
> - }
> + psr_status = (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) ?
> I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS) :
> + I915_READ(EDP_PS
> R_STATUS);
Please move this inside psr_source_status(), I don't see a point in
checking for psr2_enabled here and again in psr_source_status()
> + seq_printf(m, "SOURCE_PSR_STATUS: %x[%s]\n",
It's easier on the eyes if these strings are consistent, there is no
benefit in writing only this string differently.
Sink status is printed as "Sink PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n". Please do the
same by writing this as "Source PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n"
> + psr_status,
> + psr_source_status(psr_status, dev_priv-
> >psr.psr2_enabled));
>
> if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
> struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &dev_priv->psr.enabled-
> >aux;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 513b4a4..3c42021 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4069,6 +4069,7 @@ enum {
> #define EDP_PSR_STATUS_SENDING_TP2_TP3 (1<<8)
> #define EDP_PSR_STATUS_SENDING_TP1 (1<<4)
> #define EDP_PSR_STATUS_IDLE_MASK 0xf
> +#define EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT 29
You ignored my review from last time, please move this where the mask
'EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK' is defined. The rest of the file maintains
this consistently and there is no reason to change that.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-22 8:57 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status vathsala nagaraju
2018-05-22 10:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status (rev3) Patchwork
2018-05-22 10:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-22 13:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-05-22 19:58 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-05-23 5:37 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status Nagaraju, Vathsala
2018-05-23 17:41 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-27 8:08 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: " vathsala nagaraju
2018-07-02 18:38 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-22 3:59 vathsala nagaraju
2018-06-22 18:51 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-21 8:06 vathsala nagaraju
2018-06-21 9:01 ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-25 6:20 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : " vathsala nagaraju
2018-06-12 23:29 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-19 15:03 ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-25 5:37 vathsala nagaraju
2018-04-27 6:24 vathsala nagaraju
2018-05-10 2:02 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-04-20 9:36 vathsala nagaraju
2018-04-20 17:14 ` Souza, Jose
2018-04-25 0:56 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-04-27 5:58 ` vathsala nagaraju
2018-04-20 17:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-21 4:00 ` Nagaraju, Vathsala
2018-04-23 8:00 ` vathsala nagaraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1527019137.2226.12.camel@intel.com \
--to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox