Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: vathsala nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:58:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1527019137.2226.12.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526979431-716-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>

On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 14:27 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> From: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
> 
> Prints live state of psr1.Extending the existing
> PSR2 live state function to cover psr1.
> 
> Tested on KBL with psr2 and psr1 panel.
> 
> v2: rebase
> v3: DK
>     Rename psr2_live_status to psr_source_status
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> ------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h     |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 5251544..e4a2f15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2596,25 +2596,42 @@ static int i915_guc_log_relay_release(struct
> inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	.release = i915_guc_log_relay_release,
>  };
>  
> -static const char *psr2_live_status(u32 val)
> -{
> -	static const char * const live_status[] = {
> -		"IDLE",
> -		"CAPTURE",
> -		"CAPTURE_FS",
> -		"SLEEP",
> -		"BUFON_FW",
> -		"ML_UP",
> -		"SU_STANDBY",
> -		"FAST_SLEEP",
> -		"DEEP_SLEEP",
> -		"BUF_ON",
> -		"TG_ON"
> -	};
> -
> -	val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> -	if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> -		return live_status[val];
> +static const char *psr_source_status(u32 val, bool is_psr2_enabled)
Please change this to psr_source_status(drm_i915_private *dev_priv)

> +{
> +	if (is_psr2_enabled) {
> +		static const char * const live_status[] = {
> +			"IDLE",
> +			"CAPTURE",
> +			"CAPTURE_FS",
> +			"SLEEP",
> +			"BUFON_FW",
> +			"ML_UP",
> +			"SU_STANDBY",
> +			"FAST_SLEEP",
> +			"DEEP_SLEEP",
> +			"BUF_ON",
> +			"TG_ON"
> +		};
With that, you can		
		live_status = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS);
> +		val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> +			EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> +		if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> +			return live_status[val];
> +	} else {
> +		static const char * const live_status[] = {
> +			"IDLE",
> +			"SRDONACK",
> +			"SRDENT",
> +			"BUFOFF",
> +			"BUFON",
> +			"AUXACK",
> +			"SRDOFFACK",
> +			"SRDENT_ON",
> +		};

		live_status = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_STATUS);
> +		val = (val & EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> +			EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> +		if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> +			return live_status[val];
> +	}
>  
>  	return "unknown";
>  }
> @@ -2647,6 +2664,7 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file
> *m, void *data)
>  	enum pipe pipe;
>  	bool enabled = false;
>  	bool sink_support;
> +	u32 psr_status;
>  
>  	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -2714,12 +2732,12 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct
> seq_file *m, void *data)
>  
>  		seq_printf(m, "Performance_Counter: %u\n", psrperf);
>  	}
> -	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> -		u32 psr2 = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS);
>  
> -		seq_printf(m, "EDP_PSR2_STATUS: %x [%s]\n",
> -			   psr2, psr2_live_status(psr2));
> -	}
> +	psr_status = (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) ?
> I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS) :
> +						    I915_READ(EDP_PS
> R_STATUS);

Please move this inside psr_source_status(), I don't see a point in
checking for psr2_enabled here and again in psr_source_status()



> +	seq_printf(m, "SOURCE_PSR_STATUS: %x[%s]\n",
It's easier on the eyes if these strings are consistent, there is no
benefit in writing only this string differently.

Sink status is printed as "Sink PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n". Please do the
same by writing this as "Source PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n"
 
> +		     psr_status,
> +		     psr_source_status(psr_status, dev_priv-
> >psr.psr2_enabled));
>  
>  	if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
>  		struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &dev_priv->psr.enabled-
> >aux;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 513b4a4..3c42021 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4069,6 +4069,7 @@ enum {
>  #define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_SENDING_TP2_TP3	(1<<8)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_SENDING_TP1		(1<<4)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_IDLE_MASK		0xf
> +#define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT		29

You ignored my review from last time, please move this where the mask
'EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK' is defined. The rest of the file maintains
this consistently and there is no reason to change that.



_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-22 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-22  8:57 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status vathsala nagaraju
2018-05-22 10:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status (rev3) Patchwork
2018-05-22 10:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-22 13:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-05-22 19:58 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-05-23  5:37   ` [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status Nagaraju, Vathsala
2018-05-23 17:41     ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-27  8:08 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: " vathsala nagaraju
2018-07-02 18:38 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-22  3:59 vathsala nagaraju
2018-06-22 18:51 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-21  8:06 vathsala nagaraju
2018-06-21  9:01 ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-25  6:20 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : " vathsala nagaraju
2018-06-12 23:29 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-19 15:03   ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-25  5:37 vathsala nagaraju
2018-04-27  6:24 vathsala nagaraju
2018-05-10  2:02 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-04-20  9:36 vathsala nagaraju
2018-04-20 17:14 ` Souza, Jose
2018-04-25  0:56   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-04-27  5:58     ` vathsala nagaraju
2018-04-20 17:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-21  4:00   ` Nagaraju, Vathsala
2018-04-23  8:00     ` vathsala nagaraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1527019137.2226.12.camel@intel.com \
    --to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox