Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i915/psr/bdw+: Enable CRC check in the static frame on the sink side
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 17:02:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1527033725.2226.28.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180517222118.14246-6-jose.souza@intel.com>

On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 15:21 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame and
> compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by
> source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD
> and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR on DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
> 
> Also spec recommends to disable MAX_SLEEP as a trigger to exit PSR
> when
> CRC check is enabled to improve power savings.
> 
> Spec: 7723
> 
> v3:
> disabling PSR instead of exiting on error
> 
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 196a0eb79272..1add22e664ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4020,6 +4020,7 @@ enum {
>  #define   EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT			(1<<12)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL			(0<<11)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL			(1<<11)
> +#define   EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE			(1<<10) /* BDW+
> */
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us		(0<<8)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us		(1<<8)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us		(2<<8)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index f72e3f91809f..2f29dcd6f69e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -363,6 +363,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>  		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_ENABLE_PSR2;
>  	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
>  		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;
> +	if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> +		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, dpcd_val);
>  
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER,
> DP_SET_POWER_D0);
> @@ -418,6 +420,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>  	else
>  		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
>  
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> +		val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
> +
>  	val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) &
> EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK;
>  	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);
>  }
> @@ -635,11 +640,14 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		 * preventing  other hw tracking issues now we can
> rely
>  		 * on frontbuffer tracking.
>  		 */
> -		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG,
> -			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> -			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> -			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
> -			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE);
> +		u32 val = EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> +			  EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> +			  EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
> +			  EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE;
> +
> +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> +			val |= EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP;
Move Patch 7/7 ahead of this one to avoid removing this check again?

> +		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG, val);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -1051,16 +1059,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>  		goto exit;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting
> PSR\n");
> +	if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR |
> DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) {
> +		if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error,
> disabling PSR\n");
> +		if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, disabling
> PSR\n");
>  		psr_disable(intel_dp);
>  	}
> -	if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR |
> DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR))
> +	if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
>  		DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n", val);
>  	/* clear status register */
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS,
> val);
>  
> -	/* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */
> +	/* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */
>  exit:
>  	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
>  }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-22 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-17 22:21 [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/i915/psr: Nuke PSR support for VLV and CHV José Roberto de Souza
2018-05-17 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/i915/dp: Use intel_dp_aux_wait_done() to wait for previous aux xfer José Roberto de Souza
2018-06-06 23:47   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-17 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/i915/psr: Remove intel_crtc_state parameter from disable() José Roberto de Souza
2018-05-22 21:24   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-17 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/i915/psr: Begin to handle PSR/PSR2 errors set by sink José Roberto de Souza
2018-05-22 23:58   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-05 22:45     ` Souza, Jose
2018-06-13 20:17       ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-13 20:02         ` Souza, Jose
2018-06-13 22:01           ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-17 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/i915/psr: Handle PSR RFB storage error José Roberto de Souza
2018-06-13 23:00   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-17 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i915/psr/bdw+: Enable CRC check in the static frame on the sink side José Roberto de Souza
2018-05-23  0:02   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-05-17 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time timeout José Roberto de Souza
2018-05-17 22:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v3,1/7] drm/i915/psr: Nuke PSR support for VLV and CHV Patchwork
2018-05-17 22:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-05-17 22:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-18  4:28 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1527033725.2226.28.camel@intel.com \
    --to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox