From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank evasion
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:26:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530314774.25977.5.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180627200250.1515-2-tarun.vyas@intel.com>
On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 13:02 -0700, Tarun Vyas wrote:
> The PIPEDSL freezes on PSR entry and if PSR hasn't fully exited, then
> the pipe_update_start call schedules itself out to check back later.
>
> On ChromeOS-4.4 kernel, which is fairly up-to-date w.r.t drm/i915 but
> lags w.r.t core kernel code, hot plugging an external display
> triggers
> tons of "potential atomic update errors" in the dmesg, on *pipe A*. A
> closer analysis reveals that we try to read the scanline 3 times and
> eventually timeout, b/c PSR hasn't exited fully leading to a PIPEDSL
> stuck @ 1599. This issue is not seen on upstream kernels, b/c for
> *some*
> reason we loop inside intel_pipe_update start for ~2+ msec which in
> this
> case is more than enough to exit PSR fully, hence an *unstuck*
> PIPEDSL
> counter, hence no error. On the other hand, the ChromeOS kernel
> spends
> ~1.1 msec looping inside intel_pipe_update_start and hence errors out
> b/c the source is still in PSR.
>
> Regardless, we should wait for PSR exit (if PSR is disabled, we incur
> a ~1-2 usec penalty) before reading the PIPEDSL, b/c if we haven't
> fully exited PSR, then checking for vblank evasion isn't actually
> applicable.
>
> v4: Comment explaining psr_wait after enabling VBL interrupts (DK)
>
> v5: CAN_PSR() to handle platforms that don't support PSR.
>
> v6: Handle local_irq_disable on early return (Chris)
Series Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan
<dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Daniel's questions were addressed over IRC, I'll push this version if
they aren't any other concerns.
-DK
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> index 344c0e709b19..4990d6e84ddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> @@ -107,13 +107,21 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> VBLANK_EVASION
> _TIME_US);
> max = vblank_start - 1;
>
> - local_irq_disable();
> -
> if (min <= 0 || max <= 0)
> - return;
> + goto irq_disable;
>
> if (WARN_ON(drm_crtc_vblank_get(&crtc->base)))
> - return;
> + goto irq_disable;
> +
> + /*
> + * Wait for psr to idle out after enabling the VBL
> interrupts
> + * VBL interrupts will start the PSR exit and prevent a PSR
> + * re-entry as well.
> + */
> + if (CAN_PSR(dev_priv) && intel_psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv))
> + DRM_ERROR("PSR idle timed out, atomic update may
> fail\n");
> +
> + local_irq_disable();
>
> crtc->debug.min_vbl = min;
> crtc->debug.max_vbl = max;
> @@ -171,6 +179,10 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> crtc->debug.start_vbl_count =
> intel_crtc_get_vblank_counter(crtc);
>
> trace_i915_pipe_update_vblank_evaded(crtc);
> + return;
> +
> +irq_disable:
> + local_irq_disable();
> }
>
> /**
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-29 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-27 20:02 [PATCH v8 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Lockless version of psr_wait_for_idle Tarun Vyas
2018-06-27 20:02 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank evasion Tarun Vyas
2018-06-29 23:26 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-07-02 18:40 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-27 20:53 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v8,1/2] drm/i915/psr: Lockless version of psr_wait_for_idle Patchwork
2018-06-28 1:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1530314774.25977.5.camel@intel.com \
--to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=tarun.vyas@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox