Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915/dmc_wl: Track INITIATE_PM_DMD_REQ for DC5

[Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>]

Quoting Patchwork (2025-02-04 01:07:43-03:00)
>== Series Details ==
>
>Series: drm/i915/dmc_wl: Track INITIATE_PM_DMD_REQ for DC5
>URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144278/
>State : failure
>
>== Summary ==
>
>CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16058_full -> Patchwork_144278v1_full
>====================================================
>
>Summary
>-------
>
>  **FAILURE**
>
>  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_144278v1_full absolutely need to be
>  verified manually.
>  
>  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>  introduced in Patchwork_144278v1_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>  
>
>Participating hosts (11 -> 11)
>------------------------------
>
>  No changes in participating hosts
>
>Possible new issues
>-------------------
>
>  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_144278v1_full:
>
>### IGT changes ###
>
>#### Possible regressions ####

Hi, CI Team.

>
>  * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-mixed-process@vebox:
>    - shard-mtlp:         [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
>   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16058/shard-mtlp-4/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-mixed-process@vebox.html
>   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144278v1/shard-mtlp-7/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-mixed-process@vebox.html

This should probably be mapped to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13193

>
>  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend:
>    - shard-rkl:          [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
>   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16058/shard-rkl-3/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend.html
>   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144278v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend.html
>

This patch simply adds an offset to a table and should not affect
platforms with display version < 30, so none of the above failures are
related to this patch.

--
Gustavo Sousa