From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Gurchetan Singh" <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>,
"Chia-I Wu" <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
"Gert Wollny" <gert.wollny@collabora.com>,
"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
"Daniel Stone" <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
"Tomeu Vizoso" <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@chromium.org>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 4/6] dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:59:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ce233a2-36c9-3698-59f0-c4ff902bec60@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ec9313e-8498-2838-0320-331c347ce905@amd.com>
On 7/15/22 09:50, Christian König wrote:
> Am 15.07.22 um 02:52 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
>> Intel i915 GPU driver uses wait-wound mutex to lock multiple GEMs on the
>> attachment to the i915 dma-buf. In order to let all drivers utilize
>> shared
>> wait-wound context during attachment in a general way, make dma-buf
>> core to
>> acquire the ww context internally for the attachment operation and update
>> i915 driver to use the importer's ww context instead of the internal one.
>>
>> From now on all dma-buf exporters shall use the importer's ww context
>> for
>> the attachment operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 8 +++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 2 +-
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 6 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.h | 15 +++++++++--
>> 7 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> index 0ee588276534..37545ecb845a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> @@ -807,6 +807,8 @@ static struct sg_table * __map_dma_buf(struct
>> dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>> * Optionally this calls &dma_buf_ops.attach to allow
>> device-specific attach
>> * functionality.
>> *
>> + * Exporters shall use ww_ctx acquired by this function.
>> + *
>> * Returns:
>> *
>> * A pointer to newly created &dma_buf_attachment on success, or a
>> negative
>> @@ -822,6 +824,7 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked(struct dma_buf
>> *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>> void *importer_priv)
>> {
>> struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
>> + struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx;
>> int ret;
>> if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !dev))
>> @@ -841,7 +844,8 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked(struct dma_buf
>> *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>> attach->importer_ops = importer_ops;
>> attach->importer_priv = importer_priv;
>> - dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>> + ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &reservation_ww_class);
>> + dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, &ww_ctx);
>
> That won't work like this. The core property of a WW context is that you
> need to unwind all the locks and re-quire them with the contended one
> first.
>
> When you statically lock the imported one here you can't do that any more.
You're right. I felt that something is missing here, but couldn't
notice. I'll think more about this and enable
CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH. Thank you!
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-20 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-15 0:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15 0:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 1/6] dma-buf: Add _unlocked postfix to function names Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15 7:19 ` Christian König
2022-07-15 9:31 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15 11:04 ` Christian König
2022-07-15 0:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 2/6] drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15 7:31 ` Christian König
2022-07-15 0:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 3/6] dma-buf: Move all dma-bufs to dynamic locking specification Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15 0:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 4/6] dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15 6:50 ` Christian König
2022-07-15 6:59 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2022-07-19 20:05 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-20 8:29 ` Christian König
2022-07-20 12:18 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15 0:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 5/6] media: videobuf2: Stop using internal dma-buf lock Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15 0:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 6/6] dma-buf: Remove internal lock Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-19 9:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention Tomasz Figa
2022-07-20 15:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ce233a2-36c9-3698-59f0-c4ff902bec60@collabora.com \
--to=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel@fooishbar.org \
--cc=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gert.wollny@collabora.com \
--cc=gurchetansingh@chromium.org \
--cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas_os@shipmail.org \
--cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox