From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: ioctl to query a bo's cache level
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:35:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110922073512.GC2924@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316656031-11239-2-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:47:10PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/drm/i915_drm.h | 7 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> index 8a3942c..8178cbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> @@ -2292,6 +2292,7 @@ struct drm_ioctl_desc i915_ioctls[] = {
> DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_GEM_MADVISE, i915_gem_madvise_ioctl, DRM_UNLOCKED),
> DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_OVERLAY_PUT_IMAGE, intel_overlay_put_image, DRM_MASTER|DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED),
> DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_OVERLAY_ATTRS, intel_overlay_attrs, DRM_MASTER|DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED),
> + DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_GEM_GET_CACHE_TYPE, i915_gem_get_cache_type_ioctl, DRM_UNLOCKED),
> };
>
> int i915_max_ioctl = DRM_ARRAY_SIZE(i915_ioctls);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 7916bd9..2dfcb3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1118,6 +1118,8 @@ int i915_gem_get_tiling(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_file *file_priv);
> int i915_gem_get_aperture_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_file *file_priv);
> +int i915_gem_get_cache_type_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> + struct drm_file *file_priv);
> void i915_gem_load(struct drm_device *dev);
> int i915_gem_init_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
> int __must_check i915_gem_flush_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index a546a71..362da16 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -3777,6 +3777,29 @@ void i915_gem_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj)
> }
>
> int
> +i915_gem_get_cache_type_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> + struct drm_file *file_priv)
> +{
> +
> + struct drm_i915_gem_get_cache_type *args = data;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file_priv, args->handle));
> + if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + args->cache_level = obj->cache_level;
Grab struct_mutex around this, obj->cache_level might change over the
lifetime of the bo. Yeah, our locking is a mess, I know ;-)
> + drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
> +
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int
> i915_gem_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> diff --git a/include/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/drm/i915_drm.h
> index 28c0d11..a0dff8a 100644
> --- a/include/drm/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/drm/i915_drm.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ typedef struct _drm_i915_sarea {
> #define DRM_I915_OVERLAY_PUT_IMAGE 0x27
> #define DRM_I915_OVERLAY_ATTRS 0x28
> #define DRM_I915_GEM_EXECBUFFER2 0x29
> +#define DRM_I915_GEM_GET_CACHE_TYPE 0x2a
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_I915_INIT DRM_IOW( DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_INIT, drm_i915_init_t)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_I915_FLUSH DRM_IO ( DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_FLUSH)
> @@ -239,6 +240,7 @@ typedef struct _drm_i915_sarea {
> #define DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_MADVISE DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_GEM_MADVISE, struct drm_i915_gem_madvise)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_I915_OVERLAY_PUT_IMAGE DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_OVERLAY_PUT_IMAGE, struct drm_intel_overlay_put_image)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_I915_OVERLAY_ATTRS DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_OVERLAY_ATTRS, struct drm_intel_overlay_attrs)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_CACHE_TYPE DRM_IOR (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_GEM_GET_CACHE_TYPE, struct drm_i915_gem_get_cache_type)
>
> /* Allow drivers to submit batchbuffers directly to hardware, relying
> * on the security mechanisms provided by hardware.
> @@ -844,4 +846,9 @@ struct drm_intel_overlay_attrs {
> __u32 gamma5;
> };
>
> +struct drm_i915_gem_get_cache_type {
> + __u32 handle;
> + __u32 cache_level;
> +};
> +
> #endif /* _I915_DRM_H_ */
> --
> 1.7.6.3
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-22 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-20 4:25 [PATCH 1/6] RFCish: write only mappings (aka non-blocking) Ben Widawsky
2011-09-20 4:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: object CPU flush interface Ben Widawsky
2011-09-20 4:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: write only object tracking Ben Widawsky
2011-09-20 4:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Support write only mappings Ben Widawsky
2011-09-20 5:29 ` Keith Packard
2011-09-20 5:37 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-09-20 8:30 ` Chris Wilson
2011-09-20 4:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] intel: write only map support Ben Widawsky
2011-09-20 4:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] write-only mappings Ben Widawsky
2011-09-20 4:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] intel: use write only maps for MapRangeBuffer Ben Widawsky
2011-09-20 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/6] RFCish: write only mappings (aka non-blocking) Daniel Vetter
2011-09-20 17:17 ` Eric Anholt
2011-09-20 19:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-09-21 8:19 ` [PATCH] intel: non-blocking mmaps on the cheap Daniel Vetter
2011-09-21 18:11 ` Eric Anholt
2011-09-21 19:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-09-22 1:47 ` [PATCH cont'd] " Ben Widawsky
2011-09-22 1:47 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: ioctl to query a bo's cache level Ben Widawsky
2011-09-22 7:35 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2011-09-22 15:36 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-09-22 15:49 ` Chris Wilson
2011-09-22 1:47 ` [PATCH] on top of daniel Ben Widawsky
2011-09-22 7:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-09-22 7:33 ` [PATCH cont'd] intel: non-blocking mmaps on the cheap Daniel Vetter
2011-09-20 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] RFCish: write only mappings (aka non-blocking) Chris Wilson
2011-09-21 7:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-09-20 22:19 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-09-21 7:07 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110922073512.GC2924@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox