From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: enable semaphores on gen6 if dmar is not active
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:52:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120402205145.GA637@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAObL_7F4GBqpCR2ZJ2zO4t0moxkOq1TuFgaoN_QFzygmGdxZ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:45:39PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > Inspired by the recent ppgtt regression report, where switching of
> > dmar only for the gpu seems to fix things completely, I've looked
> > again at the semaphores+vt-d situation.
> >
> > Contrary to my earlier testing a few months back my system is now
> > stable with dmar disabled for the igd, and not only when disabling
> > dmar completely.
> >
> > So I'm rather hopeful that all our recent fixes for snb have changed
> > things for code and it's time to try enabling semaphores again. We've
> > also had issues with enabling semaphores which are not vt-d related,
> > but I guess these are all fixed by the autoreport-disabling and lazy
> > request fix. And there's only one way to find out whether there are
> > still other issues ...
> >
> > Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > If no further vt-d regressions show up in the 3.4 cycle I plan to
> > merge this into -next for 3.5 (in a month or so). Comments about how
> > unfeasibly you deem this highly welcome.
> > -Daniel
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > index 8e0b686..ac52433 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > @@ -849,9 +849,11 @@ intel_enable_semaphores(struct drm_device *dev)
> > if (i915_semaphores >= 0)
> > return i915_semaphores;
> >
> > - /* Disable semaphores on SNB */
> > - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 6)
> > - return 0;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
> > + /* Disable semaphores on SNB if VT-d is on. */
> > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 6 && intel_iommu_gfx_mapped)
> > + return false;
>
> It might be nice to have a printk here giving instructions for how to work
> around this. For example:
>
> i915: Disabling semaphores to work around a DMAR issue. As an
> alternative, boot with intel_iommu=igfx_off [or on, igfx_off, or
> whatever it's supposed to be].
>
> The documentation in kernel-parameters.txt is at best unclear to the
> uninitiated.
If this really does work, I'll look into this. Atm it's still unclear
where to exactly put the plain, we need to annoy internal hardware people
to analyze this. Once we have enough evidence that the combination of gpu
with various features enable plus VT-d just doesn't seem to work reliably.
So can you check whether things do indeed work with this patch, atop
kernel 3.4-rc1? Iirc you've been the one with the most trouble when
semaphores are enabled ...
Yours, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-02 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-02 18:48 [PATCH] drm/i915: enable semaphores on gen6 if dmar is not active Daniel Vetter
2012-04-02 20:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrew Lutomirski
2012-04-02 20:52 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-04-02 21:44 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-04-02 22:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2012-04-17 9:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-27 17:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-05-05 12:55 ` Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-09 22:40 Daniel Vetter
2012-05-09 23:03 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-05-10 8:35 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120402205145.GA637@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox