From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: rc6 residency (fix the fix)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:02:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120422110232.4d52a440@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335116390_21488@CP5-2952>
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:39:23 +0100
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 10:35:29 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:49:53 +0100
> > Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:50:01 -0700, Ben Widawsky
> > > <ben@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> > > > Chris' fix for my 32b breakage was incorrect. do_div returns a
> > > > remainder. Go back to a divide macro which is more 32b friendly.
> > > >
> > > > Tested on x86-64.
> > > >
> > > > This has only been compile tested on 32b systems.
> > > Doesn't compile on my 32-bit systems.
> > >
> > > Still does a 64-bit divide.
> >
> > This is weird. I don't understand what's broken exactly. It should
> > be dividing an unsigned long long, which the 32b compiler should
> > have no issue with. The macro itself expands to do_div which was
> > your original fix.
> >
> > What is the error message you get?
> Undefined reference to __udivid3.
>
> The reason is that the result of DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL is a 64-bit value,
> which we then proceed to divide by 100.
> -Chris
>
Does div_round64 work for you? I think that is the best solution.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-22 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-20 18:50 [PATCH] drm/i915: rc6 residency (fix the fix) Ben Widawsky
2012-04-20 19:24 ` Chris Wilson
2012-04-20 19:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-22 15:49 ` Chris Wilson
2012-04-22 17:35 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-04-22 17:39 ` Chris Wilson
2012-04-22 18:02 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2012-04-22 18:11 ` Chris Wilson
2012-04-23 2:57 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-04-23 7:38 ` Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-22 18:27 Ben Widawsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120422110232.4d52a440@bwidawsk.net \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox