From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: kick any firmware framebuffers before claiming the gtt
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:30:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120613113044.GG4829@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339493297-23829-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:28:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Especially vesafb likes to map everything as uc- (yikes), and if that
> mapping hangs around still while we try to map the gtt as wc the
> kernel will downgrade our request to uc-, resulting in abyssal
> performance.
>
> Unfortunately we can't do this as early as readon does (i.e. as the
> first thing we do when initializing the hw) because our fb/mmio space
> region moves around on a per-gen basis. So I've had to move it below
> the gtt initialization, but that seems to work, too. The important
> thing is that we do this before we set up the gtt wc mapping.
>
> Now an altogether different question is why people compile their
> kernels with vesafb enabled, but I guess making things just work isn't
> bad per se ...
>
> v2:
> - s/radeondrmfb/inteldrmfb/
> - fix up error handling
>
> v3: Kill #ifdef X86, this is Intel after all. Noticed by Ben Widawsky.
>
> v4: Jani Nikula complained about the pointless bool primary
> initialization.
>
> v5: Don't oops if we can't allocate, noticed by Chris Wilson.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: "Kilarski, Bernard R" <bernard.r.kilarski@intel.com>
> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I've pushed this to dinq with Chris' irc bikeshed fixed and r-b added.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-13 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 15:07 [PATCH] drm/i915: kick any firmware framebuffers before claiming the gtt Daniel Vetter
2012-06-11 15:35 ` Ville Syrjälä
2012-06-11 16:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-11 16:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-11 23:43 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-06-12 8:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-12 8:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-12 8:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-12 9:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-12 11:43 ` Singh, Satyeshwar
2012-06-12 11:58 ` Chris Wilson
2012-06-12 12:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-13 11:30 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-06-12 8:52 ` Chris Wilson
2012-06-11 15:58 ` Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-01 15:09 Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120613113044.GG4829@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox