Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Wrap external callers to IPS state with appropriate locks
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:47:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120926114723.GA1980@bremse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348564572-20046-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:16:12AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Finishes commit 02d719562ef40483648b2cc46899d4a2ff5953bb
> Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Date:   Thu Aug 9 16:44:54 2012 +0200
> 
>     drm/i915: properly guard ilk ips state
> 
> The core functions were annotated with their locking requirements, but
> we overlooked that they were exported, without any control over the
> locking, to debugfs. So in order to enable debugfs to read the registers
> without triggering sanity checks, we change the exported entry points to
> properly take the required locks before calling the core routines.
> 
> Reported-by: yangguang <guang.a.yang@intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Merged, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |   40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 4e16cc1..f459e30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2735,7 +2735,7 @@ static const struct cparams {
>  	{ 0, 800, 231, 23784 },
>  };
>  
> -unsigned long i915_chipset_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +static unsigned long __i915_chipset_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	u64 total_count, diff, ret;
>  	u32 count1, count2, count3, m = 0, c = 0;
> @@ -2789,6 +2789,22 @@ unsigned long i915_chipset_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +unsigned long i915_chipset_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	unsigned long val;
> +
> +	if (dev_priv->info->gen != 5)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> +
> +	val = __i915_chipset_val(dev_priv);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> +
> +	return val;
> +}
> +
>  unsigned long i915_mch_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	unsigned long m, x, b;
> @@ -2992,7 +3008,7 @@ void i915_update_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
>  }
>  
> -unsigned long i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +static unsigned long __i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	unsigned long t, corr, state1, corr2, state2;
>  	u32 pxvid, ext_v;
> @@ -3029,6 +3045,22 @@ unsigned long i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	return dev_priv->ips.gfx_power + state2;
>  }
>  
> +unsigned long i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	unsigned long val;
> +
> +	if (dev_priv->info->gen != 5)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> +
> +	val = __i915_gfx_val(dev_priv);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> +
> +	return val;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * i915_read_mch_val - return value for IPS use
>   *
> @@ -3045,8 +3077,8 @@ unsigned long i915_read_mch_val(void)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	dev_priv = i915_mch_dev;
>  
> -	chipset_val = i915_chipset_val(dev_priv);
> -	graphics_val = i915_gfx_val(dev_priv);
> +	chipset_val = __i915_chipset_val(dev_priv);
> +	graphics_val = __i915_gfx_val(dev_priv);
>  
>  	ret = chipset_val + graphics_val;
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-26 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-25  9:16 [PATCH] drm/i915: Wrap external callers to IPS state with appropriate locks Chris Wilson
2012-09-26 11:47 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-25 13:25 Chris Wilson
2012-09-25 13:55 ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120926114723.GA1980@bremse \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox