From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: don't disable disconnected outputs
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:33:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121218203330.GX5737@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121218085633.3baa4836@jbarnes-desktop>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:56:33AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:37:54 +0100
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> > This piece of neat lore has been ported painstakingly and bug-for-bug
> > compatible from the old crtc helper code.
> >
> > Imo it's utter nonsense.
> >
> > If you disconnected a cable and before you reconnect it, userspace (or
> > the kernel) does an set_crtc call, this will result in that connector
> > getting disabled. Which will result in a nice black screen when
> > plugging in the cable again.
> >
> > There's absolutely no reason the kernel does such policy enforcements
> > - if userspace tries to set up a mode on something disconnected we
> > might fail loudly (since the dp link training fails), but silently
> > adjusting the output configuration behind userspace's back is a recipe
> > for disaster. Specifically I think that this could explain some of our
> > MI_WAIT hangs around suspend, where userspace issues a scanline wait
> > on a disable pipe. This mechanisims here could explain how that pipe
> > got disabled without userspace noticing.
> >
> > Note that this fixes a NULL deref at BIOS takeover when the firmware
> > sets up a disconnected output in a clone configuration with a
> > connected output on the 2nd pipe: When doing the full modeset we don't
> > have a mode for the 2nd pipe and OOPS. On the first pipe this doesn't
> > matter, since at boot-up the fbdev helpers will set up the choosen
> > configuration on that on first. Since this is now the umptenth bug
> > around handling this imo brain-dead semantics correctly, I think it's
> > time to kill it and see whether there's any userspace out there which
> > relies on this.
> >
> > It also nicely demonstrates that we have a tiny window where DP
> > hotplug can still kill the driver.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58396
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Tested-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 34832bc0..399f862 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -7632,10 +7632,6 @@ intel_modeset_stage_output_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("encoder changed, full mode switch\n");
> > config->mode_changed = true;
> > }
> > -
> > - /* Disable all disconnected encoders. */
> > - if (connector->base.status == connector_status_disconnected)
> > - connector->new_encoder = NULL;
> > }
> > /* connector->new_encoder is now updated for all connectors. */
> >
>
> I think this is safe now; iirc this logic comes from X, when we weren't
> sure about the initial config so we just shut everything off pretty
> aggressively. We clearly weren't thinking of atomic mode sets back
> then either...
>
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the review.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-18 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-18 8:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: don't disable disconnected outputs Daniel Vetter
2012-12-18 11:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2012-12-18 16:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jesse Barnes
2012-12-18 20:33 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-11 17:46 Daniel Vetter
2012-10-12 9:02 ` Chris Wilson
2012-10-12 9:13 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121218203330.GX5737@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox