Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jack Winter <jbh@alchemy.lu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fix up _wait_for macro
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:00:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130328110056.GK4469@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364425405-1200-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:03:25AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> As Thomas Gleixner spotted, it's rather horrible racy:
> - We can miss almost a full tick, so need to compensate by 1 jiffy.

I have a feeling this is a rather common pattern, so I wonder
if [mu]secs_to_jiffies() should do the +1 already for everyone.
Or maybe there should be some other macros for specifying
timeouts that would do the +1.

> - We need to re-check the condition when having timed-out, since a
>   the last check could have been before the timeout expired. E.g. when
>   we've been preempted or a long irq happened.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Reported-by: Jack Winter <jbh@alchemy.lu>
> Cc: Jack Winter <jbh@alchemy.lu>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 13 +++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index c8c1979..9dcae4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -33,12 +33,21 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_fb_helper.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_dp_helper.h>
>  
> +/**
> + * _wait_for - magic (register) wait macro
> + *
> + * Does the right thing for modeset paths when run under kdgb or similar atomic
> + * contexts. Note that it's important that we check the condition again after
> + * having timed out, since the timeout could be due to preemption or similar and
> + * we've never had a chance to check the condition before the timeout.
> + */
>  #define _wait_for(COND, MS, W) ({ \
> -	unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MS);	\
> +	unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MS) + 1;	\
>  	int ret__ = 0;							\
>  	while (!(COND)) {						\
>  		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout__)) {			\
> -			ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT;				\
> +			if (!(COND))					\
> +				ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT;			\
>  			break;						\
>  		}							\
>  		if (W && drm_can_sleep())  {				\
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-28 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-27 23:03 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: fold wait_for_atomic_us into wait_for_atomic Daniel Vetter
2013-03-27 23:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fix up _wait_for macro Daniel Vetter
2013-03-28 11:00   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2013-03-28 15:41     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-28 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: fold wait_for_atomic_us into wait_for_atomic Ville Syrjälä
2013-03-28 10:31   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-03-28 10:53     ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130328110056.GK4469@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jbh@alchemy.lu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox