From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, miku@iki.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: track ring progression using seqnos
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:40:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130517174020.GD14275@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1368451933-32571-2-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 04:32:10PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Instead of relying in acthd, track ring seqno progression
> to detect if ring has hung.
>
> v2: put hangcheck stuff inside struct (Chris Wilson)
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 14817de..db7cda9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -834,8 +834,6 @@ struct i915_gpu_error {
> #define DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD)
> struct timer_list hangcheck_timer;
> int hangcheck_count;
> - uint32_t last_acthd[I915_NUM_RINGS];
> - uint32_t prev_instdone[I915_NUM_INSTDONE_REG];
>
> /* For reset and error_state handling. */
> spinlock_t lock;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 0e5c9b0..004ad34 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -2384,22 +2384,19 @@ void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = (struct drm_device *)data;
> drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> - uint32_t acthd[I915_NUM_RINGS], instdone[I915_NUM_INSTDONE_REG];
> struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
> bool err = false, idle;
> int i;
> + u32 seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS];
> + bool work_done;
>
> if (!i915_enable_hangcheck)
> return;
>
> - memset(acthd, 0, sizeof(acthd));
> idle = true;
> for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) {
> - u32 seqno;
> -
> - seqno = ring->get_seqno(ring, false);
> - idle &= i915_hangcheck_ring_idle(ring, seqno, &err);
> - acthd[i] = intel_ring_get_active_head(ring);
> + seqno[i] = ring->get_seqno(ring, false);
> + idle &= i915_hangcheck_ring_idle(ring, seqno[i], &err);
> }
>
> /* If all work is done then ACTHD clearly hasn't advanced. */
> @@ -2415,20 +2412,19 @@ void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
> return;
> }
>
> - i915_get_extra_instdone(dev, instdone);
> - if (memcmp(dev_priv->gpu_error.last_acthd, acthd,
> - sizeof(acthd)) == 0 &&
> - memcmp(dev_priv->gpu_error.prev_instdone, instdone,
> - sizeof(instdone)) == 0) {
> + work_done = false;
> + for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) {
> + if (ring->hangcheck.seqno != seqno[i]) {
> + work_done = true;
> + ring->hangcheck.seqno = seqno[i];
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!work_done) {
> if (i915_hangcheck_hung(dev))
> return;
> } else {
> dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_count = 0;
> -
> - memcpy(dev_priv->gpu_error.last_acthd, acthd,
> - sizeof(acthd));
> - memcpy(dev_priv->gpu_error.prev_instdone, instdone,
> - sizeof(instdone));
> }
>
> repeat:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index dac1614..ef374a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page {
> #define I915_READ_SYNC_0(ring) I915_READ(RING_SYNC_0((ring)->mmio_base))
> #define I915_READ_SYNC_1(ring) I915_READ(RING_SYNC_1((ring)->mmio_base))
>
> +struct intel_ring_hangcheck {
> + u32 seqno;
> +};
> +
Shouldn't you initialize this thing in i915_gem_init_seqno()?
> struct intel_ring_buffer {
> const char *name;
> enum intel_ring_id {
> @@ -137,6 +141,8 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer {
> struct i915_hw_context *default_context;
> struct i915_hw_context *last_context;
>
> + struct intel_ring_hangcheck hangcheck;
> +
> void *private;
> };
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-17 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 13:32 [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: pass seqno to i915_hangcheck_ring_idle Mika Kuoppala
2013-05-13 13:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: track ring progression using seqnos Mika Kuoppala
2013-05-17 17:40 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2013-05-24 14:16 ` [PATCH 02/14] " Mika Kuoppala
2013-05-13 13:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: introduce i915_hangcheck_ring_hung Mika Kuoppala
2013-05-24 18:26 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-05-25 11:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-05-13 13:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: detect hang using per ring hangcheck_score Mika Kuoppala
2013-05-27 1:34 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-05-27 17:42 ` Mika Kuoppala
2013-05-30 6:04 ` [PATCH] " Mika Kuoppala
2013-05-13 13:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: remove i915_hangcheck_hung Mika Kuoppala
2013-05-29 17:48 ` Ben Widawsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130517174020.GD14275@bwidawsk.net \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=miku@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox