From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: correct intel_dp_get_config() function for DevCPT
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:30:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130627103057.GL18285@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372310717-12142-1-git-send-email-xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:17PM +0800, Xiong Zhang wrote:
> On DevCPT, the control register for Transcoder DP Sync Polarity is
> TRANS_DP_CTL, not DP_CTL.
> Without this patch, Many OOP occur on CPT machine with DP monitor.The OOP
> is like: *ERROR* mismatch in adjusted_mode.flags(expected X,found X)
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 8708a0c..16c5803 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1324,20 +1324,57 @@ static void intel_dp_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config)
> {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&encoder->base);
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = encoder->base.dev->dev_private;
> u32 tmp, flags = 0;
> + struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + enum port port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->port;
>
> - tmp = I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg);
> + if ((port == PORT_A) || !HAS_PCH_CPT(dev)) {
> + tmp = I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg);
> + if (tmp & DP_SYNC_HS_HIGH)
> + flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC;
> + else
> + flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC;
>
> - if (tmp & DP_SYNC_HS_HIGH)
> - flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC;
> - else
> - flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC;
> + if (tmp & DP_SYNC_VS_HIGH)
> + flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC;
> + else
> + flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC;
> + } else {
> + u32 trans_sel = 0;
> + int i;
>
> - if (tmp & DP_SYNC_VS_HIGH)
> - flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC;
> - else
> - flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC;
> + switch (intel_dp->output_reg) {
> + case PCH_DP_B:
> + trans_sel = TRANS_DP_PORT_SEL_B;
> + break;
> + case PCH_DP_C:
> + trans_sel = TRANS_DP_PORT_SEL_C;
> + break;
> + case PCH_DP_D:
> + trans_sel = TRANS_DP_PORT_SEL_D;
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + for_each_pipe(i) {
> + tmp = I915_READ(TRANS_DP_CTL(i));
> + if ((tmp & TRANS_DP_PORT_SEL_MASK) == trans_sel) {
> + if (tmp & TRANS_DP_HSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH)
> + flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC;
> + else
> + flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC;
> +
> + if (tmp & TRANS_DP_VSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH)
> + flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC;
> + else
> + flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC;
> +
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
Instead of duplicating the encoder->pipe mapping code here again (from the
get_hw_state function) I think it'd be better to add a enum pipe pipe
argument to encoder->get_config functions. Or maybe we should pass in the
intel_crtc *crtc pointer right away, in case we ever need other things
from the connected crtc.
So one patch to extend the get_config function:
/* Reconstructs the equivalent mode flags for the current hardware
* state. This must be called _after_ display->get_pipe_config has
* pre-filled the pipe config. */
void (*get_config)(struct intel_encoder *,
struct intel_crtc *,
struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config);
And then your patch should reduce a lot.
Cheers, Daniel
>
> pipe_config->adjusted_mode.flags |= flags;
> }
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-27 5:25 [PATCH] drm/i915: correct intel_dp_get_config() function for DevCPT Xiong Zhang
2013-06-27 10:30 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-28 4:59 Xiong Zhang
2013-06-28 8:28 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130627103057.GL18285@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=xiong.y.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox