public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Jan Niggemann <jn@hz6.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: i915 irq storm mitigation in 3.10
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 22:03:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130708200316.GG18285@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b828191fde71b2243f883e2dbb28d6d@hz6.de>

On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 11:41:07PM +0200, Jan Niggemann wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> I'm not sure, but I think the recent patch to keep i915 systems from
> locking up / slowing down in case of irq storms didn't fully help.
> I compiled 3.10, but every now and then, my system has the same
> symptoms as before.
> 
> grep storm /var/log/messages
> Jul  5 21:55:43 muretop kernel: [  324.767375] [drm] HPD interrupt
> storm detected on connector DP-3: switching from hotplug detection
> to polling
> Jul  6 23:05:57 muretop kernel: [  200.372208] [drm] HPD interrupt
> storm detected on connector HDMI-A-1: switching from hotplug
> detection to polling
> Jul  6 23:07:51 muretop kernel: [  313.752039] [drm] HPD interrupt
> storm detected on connector DP-3: switching from hotplug detection
> to pol
> 
> I notice up to 50% CPU from kworker/u8:0 when my system slows down.
> 
> I'm new to kernel development, but if you tell me what to do, I'm
> very willing to help diagnosing this.

Seems to work as advertised, once we detect a storm we kill the hotplug
interrupt. Note that since on many systems these storms only happen in
certain conditions (e.g. specific battery charger state) we'll re-enable
the interrupts every 2 minutes to check whether the storm has passed
(there's not really any other way).

But every time this happens we only let through a few interrupts, so this
shouldn't affect you badly. Can you please check whether those slowdowns
line up with 2 minute intervalls?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-08 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-06 21:41 i915 irq storm mitigation in 3.10 Jan Niggemann
2013-07-08 20:03 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2013-07-21 20:23   ` Jan Niggemann
2013-07-21 20:43     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-22  6:14       ` Jan Niggemann
2013-07-22  6:26         ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-22  8:04       ` Egbert Eich
2013-07-22 19:28         ` Jan Niggemann
2013-07-22 20:36           ` Egbert Eich
2013-07-23  8:17             ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-23 11:26           ` Egbert Eich
2013-07-24 20:52             ` Jan Niggemann
2013-07-25  7:50               ` Egbert Eich
2013-07-25  9:58                 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-25 11:18                   ` Egbert Eich
2013-07-25 21:23                   ` Jan Niggemann
2013-07-26  5:11                     ` Egbert Eich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130708200316.GG18285@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jn@hz6.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox