From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Use the common register access functions for NOTRACE variants
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:34:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130712203408.GH15384@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373637756-11852-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 03:02:33PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Detangle the confusion that NOTRACE variants of the register read/write
> routines were directly using the raw register access. We need for those
> routines to reuse the common code for serializing register access and
> ensuring the correct register power states. This is only possible now
> that the only routines that required raw access use their own API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index f140b04..1ab6d4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2082,7 +2082,7 @@ int vlv_gpu_freq(int ddr_freq, int val);
> int vlv_freq_opcode(int ddr_freq, int val);
>
> #define __i915_read(x, y) \
> - u##x i915_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg);
> + u##x i915_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, bool trace);
>
> __i915_read(8, b)
> __i915_read(16, w)
> @@ -2091,7 +2091,7 @@ __i915_read(64, q)
> #undef __i915_read
>
> #define __i915_write(x, y) \
> - void i915_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u##x val);
> + void i915_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u##x val, bool trace);
>
> __i915_write(8, b)
> __i915_write(16, w)
> @@ -2099,21 +2099,21 @@ __i915_write(32, l)
> __i915_write(64, q)
> #undef __i915_write
>
> -#define I915_READ8(reg) i915_read8(dev_priv, (reg))
> -#define I915_WRITE8(reg, val) i915_write8(dev_priv, (reg), (val))
> +#define I915_READ8(reg) i915_read8(dev_priv, (reg), true)
> +#define I915_WRITE8(reg, val) i915_write8(dev_priv, (reg), (val), true)
>
> -#define I915_READ16(reg) i915_read16(dev_priv, (reg))
> -#define I915_WRITE16(reg, val) i915_write16(dev_priv, (reg), (val))
> -#define I915_READ16_NOTRACE(reg) readw(dev_priv->regs + (reg))
> -#define I915_WRITE16_NOTRACE(reg, val) writew(val, dev_priv->regs + (reg))
> +#define I915_READ16(reg) i915_read16(dev_priv, (reg), true)
> +#define I915_WRITE16(reg, val) i915_write16(dev_priv, (reg), (val), true)
> +#define I915_READ16_NOTRACE(reg) i915_read16(dev_priv, (reg), false)
> +#define I915_WRITE16_NOTRACE(reg, val) i915_write16(dev_priv, (reg), (val), false)
>
> -#define I915_READ(reg) i915_read32(dev_priv, (reg))
> -#define I915_WRITE(reg, val) i915_write32(dev_priv, (reg), (val))
> -#define I915_READ_NOTRACE(reg) readl(dev_priv->regs + (reg))
> -#define I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(reg, val) writel(val, dev_priv->regs + (reg))
> +#define I915_READ(reg) i915_read32(dev_priv, (reg), true)
> +#define I915_WRITE(reg, val) i915_write32(dev_priv, (reg), (val), true)
> +#define I915_READ_NOTRACE(reg) i915_read32(dev_priv, (reg), false)
> +#define I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(reg, val) i915_write32(dev_priv, (reg), (val), false)
>
> -#define I915_WRITE64(reg, val) i915_write64(dev_priv, (reg), (val))
> -#define I915_READ64(reg) i915_read64(dev_priv, (reg))
> +#define I915_WRITE64(reg, val) i915_write64(dev_priv, (reg), (val), true)
> +#define I915_READ64(reg) i915_read64(dev_priv, (reg), true)
>
> #define POSTING_READ(reg) (void)I915_READ_NOTRACE(reg)
> #define POSTING_READ16(reg) (void)I915_READ16_NOTRACE(reg)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt.c
> index cb3116c..d4bc7f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt.c
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ hsw_unclaimed_reg_check(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
> }
>
> #define __i915_read(x, y) \
> -u##x i915_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg) { \
> +u##x i915_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, bool trace) { \
> u##x val = 0; \
> if (IS_GEN5(dev_priv->dev)) \
> ilk_dummy_write(dev_priv); \
> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ u##x i915_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg) { \
> } else { \
> val = read##y(dev_priv->regs + reg); \
> } \
> - trace_i915_reg_rw(false, reg, val, sizeof(val)); \
> + if (trace) trace_i915_reg_rw(false, reg, val, sizeof(val)); \
> return val; \
> }
>
> @@ -357,9 +357,9 @@ __i915_read(64, q)
> #undef __i915_read
>
> #define __i915_write(x, y) \
> -void i915_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u##x val) { \
> +void i915_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
> u32 __fifo_ret = 0; \
> - trace_i915_reg_rw(true, reg, val, sizeof(val)); \
> + if (trace) trace_i915_reg_rw(true, reg, val, sizeof(val)); \
> if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((dev_priv), (reg))) { \
> __fifo_ret = __gen6_gt_wait_for_fifo(dev_priv); \
> } \
if (unlikely(trace))? taking a hit on the tracing case seems like what
you want... but I never know the status of such compiler flags.
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-12 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-12 14:02 [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file Chris Wilson
2013-07-12 14:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Use a private interface for register access within GT Chris Wilson
2013-07-12 20:25 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-12 20:55 ` Chris Wilson
2013-07-12 20:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-12 14:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Use the common register access functions for NOTRACE variants Chris Wilson
2013-07-12 20:34 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2013-07-12 20:51 ` Chris Wilson
2013-07-12 14:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Serialize all register access Chris Wilson
2013-07-12 20:37 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-12 20:52 ` Chris Wilson
2013-07-16 3:20 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-12 14:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Squash gen lookup through multiple indirections inside GT access Chris Wilson
2013-07-12 14:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Convert the register access tracepoint to be conditional Chris Wilson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-12 14:59 [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file Chris Wilson
2013-07-12 14:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Use the common register access functions for NOTRACE variants Chris Wilson
2013-07-12 17:08 [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file Chris Wilson
2013-07-12 17:08 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Use the common register access functions for NOTRACE variants Chris Wilson
2013-07-16 19:02 [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file Chris Wilson
2013-07-16 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Use the common register access functions for NOTRACE variants Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130712203408.GH15384@bwidawsk.net \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox