From: "Lee, Chon Ming" <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Stephane Marchesin <marchesin@icps.u-strasbg.fr>,
Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use RCS flips on Ivybridge+
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:28:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130904092822.GD2065@ubuntu.png.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130829190753.GE5606@phenom.ffwll.local>
This patch causes VLV hang, look like ring buffer lockup.
This is the message.
[drm] stuck on render ring
I haven't look at the bspec for the different between VLV and Ivybridge on this
yet. Just see anyone have any clue why this might fail in VLV.
On 08/29 21:07, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:58:12PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > RCS flips do work on Iybridge+ so long as we can unmask the messages
> > through DERRMR. However, there are quite a few workarounds mentioned
> > regarding unmasking more than one event or triggering more than one
> > message through DERRMR. Those workarounds in principle prevent us from
> > performing pipelined flips (and asynchronous flips across multiple
> > planes) and equally apply to the "known good" BCS ring. Given that it
> > already appears to work, and also appears to work with unmasking all 3
> > planes at once (and queuing flips across multiple planes), be brave.
> >
> > Bugzlla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67600
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Lightly-tested-by: Stephane Marchesin <marchesin@icps.u-strasbg.fr>
> > Cc: Stephane Marchesin <marchesin@icps.u-strasbg.fr>
> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
>
> Both patches merged to dinq.
> -Daniel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index c6f5009..df168f4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@
> > * address/value pairs. Don't overdue it, though, x <= 2^4 must hold!
> > */
> > #define MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(x) MI_INSTR(0x22, 2*x-1)
> > +#define MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM(x) MI_INSTR(0x24, 2*x-1)
> > #define MI_FLUSH_DW MI_INSTR(0x26, 1) /* for GEN6 */
> > #define MI_FLUSH_DW_STORE_INDEX (1<<21)
> > #define MI_INVALIDATE_TLB (1<<18)
> > @@ -678,6 +679,23 @@
> > #define FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM (1<<31)
> >
> > #define DERRMR 0x44050
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEA_SCANLINE (1<<0)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEA_PRI_FLIP_DONE (1<<1)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEA_SPR_FLIP_DONE (1<<2)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEA_VBLANK (1<<3)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEA_HBLANK (1<<5)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEB_SCANLINE (1<<8)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEB_PRI_FLIP_DONE (1<<9)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEB_SPR_FLIP_DONE (1<<10)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEB_VBLANK (1<<11)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEB_HBLANK (1<<13)
> > +/* Note that PIPEC is not a simple translation of PIPEA/PIPEB */
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEC_SCANLINE (1<<14)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEC_PRI_FLIP_DONE (1<<15)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEC_SPR_FLIP_DONE (1<<20)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEC_VBLANK (1<<21)
> > +#define DERRMR_PIPEC_HBLANK (1<<22)
> > +
> >
> > /* GM45+ chicken bits -- debug workaround bits that may be required
> > * for various sorts of correct behavior. The top 16 bits of each are
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 9748dce..ffbcbd1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -7826,12 +7826,6 @@ err:
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * On gen7 we currently use the blit ring because (in early silicon at least)
> > - * the render ring doesn't give us interrpts for page flip completion, which
> > - * means clients will hang after the first flip is queued. Fortunately the
> > - * blit ring generates interrupts properly, so use it instead.
> > - */
> > static int intel_gen7_queue_flip(struct drm_device *dev,
> > struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> > @@ -7839,9 +7833,13 @@ static int intel_gen7_queue_flip(struct drm_device *dev,
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > - struct intel_ring_buffer *ring = &dev_priv->ring[BCS];
> > + struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
> > uint32_t plane_bit = 0;
> > - int ret;
> > + int len, ret;
> > +
> > + ring = obj->ring;
> > + if (ring == NULL || ring->id != RCS)
> > + ring = &dev_priv->ring[BCS];
> >
> > ret = intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(dev, obj, ring);
> > if (ret)
> > @@ -7863,10 +7861,34 @@ static int intel_gen7_queue_flip(struct drm_device *dev,
> > goto err_unpin;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4);
> > + len = 4;
> > + if (ring->id == RCS)
> > + len += 6;
> > +
> > + ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, len);
> > if (ret)
> > goto err_unpin;
> >
> > + /* Unmask the flip-done completion message. Note that the bspec says that
> > + * we should do this for both the BCS and RCS, and that we must not unmask
> > + * more than one flip event at any time (or ensure that one flip message
> > + * can be sent by waiting for flip-done prior to queueing new flips).
> > + * Experimentation says that BCS works despite DERRMR masking all
> > + * flip-done completion events and that unmasking all planes at once
> > + * for the RCS also doesn't appear to drop events. Setting the DERRMR
> > + * to zero does lead to lockups within MI_DISPLAY_FLIP.
> > + */
> > + if (ring->id == RCS) {
> > + intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
> > + intel_ring_emit(ring, DERRMR);
> > + intel_ring_emit(ring, ~(DERRMR_PIPEA_PRI_FLIP_DONE |
> > + DERRMR_PIPEB_PRI_FLIP_DONE |
> > + DERRMR_PIPEC_PRI_FLIP_DONE));
> > + intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM(1));
> > + intel_ring_emit(ring, DERRMR);
> > + intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->scratch.gtt_offset + 256);
> > + }
> > +
> > intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_I915 | plane_bit);
> > intel_ring_emit(ring, (fb->pitches[0] | obj->tiling_mode));
> > intel_ring_emit(ring, i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj) + intel_crtc->dspaddr_offset);
> > --
> > 1.8.4.rc3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-26 19:58 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Embed the ring->private within the struct intel_ring_buffer Chris Wilson
2013-08-26 19:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use RCS flips on Ivybridge+ Chris Wilson
2013-08-26 20:42 ` Stéphane Marchesin
2013-08-26 20:43 ` Stéphane Marchesin
2013-08-26 20:49 ` Chris Wilson
2013-08-29 17:11 ` Stéphane Marchesin
2013-08-29 19:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-09-04 9:28 ` Lee, Chon Ming [this message]
2013-09-04 9:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-09-04 9:49 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-09-04 9:49 ` Lee, Chon Ming
2013-09-04 9:49 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130904092822.GD2065@ubuntu.png.intel.com \
--to=chon.ming.lee@intel.com \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=marchesin@icps.u-strasbg.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox