From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:39:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140214083918.7c9aceab@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392372142-16905-2-git-send-email-vandana.kannan@intel.com>
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:32:18 +0530
Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Pradeep Bhat <pradeep.bhat@intel.com>
>
> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
> parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making
> whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels.
> This information helps us decide if seamless DRRS can be done
> at runtime to support certain power saving features. This patch
> was tested by setting necessary bit in VBT struct and merging
> the new VBT with system BIOS so that we can read the value.
>
> v2: Incorporated review comments from Chris Wilson
> Removed "intel_" as a prefix for DRRS specific declarations.
>
> v3: Incorporated Jani's review comments
> Removed function which deducts drrs mode from panel_type. Modified some
> print statements. Made changes to use DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED as 0 instead of -1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pradeep Bhat <pradeep.bhat@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 728b9c3..6b4d0b20 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1218,6 +1218,12 @@ struct ddi_vbt_port_info {
> uint8_t supports_dp:1;
> };
>
> +enum drrs_support_type {
> + DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED = 0,
> + STATIC_DRRS_SUPPORT = 1,
> + SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT = 2
> +};
> +
> struct intel_vbt_data {
> struct drm_display_mode *lfp_lvds_vbt_mode; /* if any */
> struct drm_display_mode *sdvo_lvds_vbt_mode; /* if any */
> @@ -1233,6 +1239,13 @@ struct intel_vbt_data {
> int lvds_ssc_freq;
> unsigned int bios_lvds_val; /* initial [PCH_]LVDS reg val in VBIOS */
>
> + /*
> + * DRRS support type (Seamless OR Static DRRS OR not supported)
> + * drrs_support type Val 0x2 is Seamless DRRS and 0 is Static DRRS.
> + * These values correspond to the VBT values for drrs mode.
> + */
> + enum drrs_support_type drrs_type;
> +
> /* eDP */
> int edp_rate;
> int edp_lanes;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> index 86b95ca..2414eca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> @@ -218,6 +218,25 @@ parse_lfp_panel_data(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> panel_type = lvds_options->panel_type;
>
> + dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type = (lvds_options->dps_panel_type_bits
> + >> (panel_type * 2)) & MODE_MASK;
> + /*
> + * VBT has static DRRS = 0 and seamless DRRS = 2.
> + * The below piece of code is required to adjust vbt.drrs_type
> + * to match the enum drrs_support_type.
> + */
> + switch (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type) {
> + case 0:
> + dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type = STATIC_DRRS_SUPPORT;
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS supported mode is static\n");
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS supported mode is seamless\n");
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> lvds_lfp_data = find_section(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
> if (!lvds_lfp_data)
> return;
> @@ -516,6 +535,16 @@ parse_driver_features(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> if (driver->dual_frequency)
> dev_priv->render_reclock_avail = true;
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS State Enabled:%d\n", driver->drrs_enabled);
> + /*
> + * If DRRS is not supported, drrs_type has to be set to 0.
> + * This is because, VBT is configured in such a way that
> + * static DRRS is 0 and DRRS not supported is represented by
> + * driver->drrs_enabled=false
> + */
> + if (!driver->drrs_enabled)
> + dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type = driver->drrs_enabled;
> }
>
> static void
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h
> index 282de5e..5505d6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h
> @@ -281,6 +281,9 @@ struct bdb_general_definitions {
> union child_device_config devices[0];
> } __packed;
>
> +/* Mask for DRRS / Panel Channel / SSC / BLT control bits extraction */
> +#define MODE_MASK 0x3
> +
> struct bdb_lvds_options {
> u8 panel_type;
> u8 rsvd1;
> @@ -293,6 +296,18 @@ struct bdb_lvds_options {
> u8 lvds_edid:1;
> u8 rsvd2:1;
> u8 rsvd4;
> + /* LVDS Panel channel bits stored here */
> + u32 lvds_panel_channel_bits;
> + /* LVDS SSC (Spread Spectrum Clock) bits stored here. */
> + u16 ssc_bits;
> + u16 ssc_freq;
> + u16 ssc_ddt;
> + /* Panel color depth defined here */
> + u16 panel_color_depth;
> + /* LVDS panel type bits stored here */
> + u32 dps_panel_type_bits;
> + /* LVDS backlight control type bits stored here */
> + u32 blt_control_type_bits;
> } __packed;
>
> /* LFP pointer table contains entries to the struct below */
> @@ -478,6 +493,20 @@ struct bdb_driver_features {
>
> u8 hdmi_termination;
> u8 custom_vbt_version;
> + /* Driver features data block */
> + u16 rmpm_enabled:1;
> + u16 s2ddt_enabled:1;
> + u16 dpst_enabled:1;
> + u16 bltclt_enabled:1;
> + u16 adb_enabled:1;
> + u16 drrs_enabled:1;
> + u16 grs_enabled:1;
> + u16 gpmt_enabled:1;
> + u16 tbt_enabled:1;
> + u16 psr_enabled:1;
> + u16 ips_enabled:1;
> + u16 reserved3:4;
> + u16 pc_feature_valid:1;
> } __packed;
>
> #define EDP_18BPP 0
Since I can't trust the VBT doc I have, I assume this has been tested
on real machines and works.
So:
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
The VBT choosing 0 for static and 2 for seamless is a bit annoying, but
I guess there's not much we can do about that now...
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-14 10:02 [PATCH 0/5] v5: Enabling DRRS in the kernel Vandana Kannan
2014-02-14 10:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature Vandana Kannan
2014-02-14 16:39 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2014-02-14 10:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Parse EDID probed modes for DRRS support Vandana Kannan
2014-02-14 10:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Add support for DRRS to switch RR Vandana Kannan
2014-02-14 10:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Idleness detection for DRRS Vandana Kannan
2014-02-14 10:30 ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-14 10:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/bdw: Add support for DRRS to switch RR Vandana Kannan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-23 7:52 [PATCH 0/5] Enabling DRRS in the kernel Vandana Kannan
2013-12-23 7:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature Vandana Kannan
2014-01-22 13:09 ` Jani Nikula
2014-01-30 3:29 ` Vandana Kannan
2014-01-30 6:20 ` Jani Nikula
2014-02-03 3:43 ` Vandana Kannan
2014-02-04 10:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-20 10:10 [PATCH 0/5] Enabling DRRS in the kernel Vandana Kannan
2013-12-20 10:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature Vandana Kannan
2013-12-19 8:30 [PATCH 0/5] Enabling DRRS in the kernel Vandana Kannan
2013-12-19 8:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature Vandana Kannan
2013-12-17 5:28 [PATCH 0/5] Enabling DRRS support in the kernel Vandana Kannan
2013-12-17 5:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature Vandana Kannan
2013-12-17 12:26 ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-18 8:08 ` Vandana Kannan
2013-12-18 9:11 ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-18 10:13 ` Vandana Kannan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140214083918.7c9aceab@jbarnes-desktop \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vandana.kannan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox