public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Mateo Lozano, Oscar" <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Gracefully handle obj not bound to GGTT in is_pin_display
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 16:33:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140515133352.GB27580@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92648605EABDA246B775AAB04C95A7A3012EE985@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:14:54PM +0000, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > > But looking at the code a better way should be:
> > > 1. Create new bo, wrap it in a kms fb.
> > > 2. Slap busy load onto that bo, e.g. reapeatedly fill it with the blitter.
> > > 3. Enable evil interruptor (igt_fork_signal_helper).
> > > 4. Submit pageflip
> > >
> > > -> Boom since the set_cache_level will block, get interrupted and exit
> > > early with -EINTR.
> > >
> > > Given sufficient overkill in 2. this should be 100% reliable to reproduce.
> 
> As soon as I execbuffer to the bo, it gets a vma for the GGTT vm:
> 
> 	vm = ctx->vm;
> 	if (!USES_FULL_PPGTT(dev))
> 		vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> 
> 	...
> 
> 	/* Look up object handles */
> 	ret = eb_lookup_vmas(eb, exec, args, vm, file);
> 	if (ret)
> 		goto err;
> 
> And then it becomes impossible to reproduce the problem :(
> Is there any other trick to make set_cache_level fail?

What if you make the pin_to_ggtt fail instead? Can you create an object
that's too big for the ggtt?

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-15 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-02 18:21 [PATCH] drm/i915: Gracefully handle obj not bound to GGTT in is_pin_display oscar.mateo
2014-04-02 17:59 ` Chris Wilson
2014-04-03  9:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-12  9:05   ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-05-12 10:09     ` Chris Wilson
2014-05-12 10:30       ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-05-12 10:37         ` Chris Wilson
2014-05-12 16:11     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-12 16:14       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-12 17:10         ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-05-15 13:14         ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-05-15 13:33           ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2014-05-16 10:43             ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-05-15 13:45           ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2] " oscar.mateo
2014-05-16 11:26   ` Chris Wilson
2014-05-16 13:20   ` [PATCH v3] " oscar.mateo
2014-05-16 14:25     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140515133352.GB27580@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=oscar.mateo@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox