public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Make sure PSR is ready for been re-enabled.
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:50:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140917155004.GI31703@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410909548-4945-4-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:19:08PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Let's make sure PSR is propperly disabled before to re-enabled it.
> 
> According to Spec, after disabled PSR CTL, the Idle state might occur
> up to 24ms, that is one full frame time (1/refresh rate),
> plus SRD exit training time (max of 6ms),
> plus SRD aux channel handshake (max of 1.5ms).
> 
> So if something went wrong PSR will be disabled until next full
> enable/disable setup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 2f0eee5..658a911 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1885,6 +1885,17 @@ static void intel_edp_psr_do_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	WARN_ON(dev_priv->psr.active);
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  
> +	/* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable
> +	 * otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle.
> +	 * PSR might take up to 24 ms to get fully disabled
> +	 * and be ready for re-enable.
> +	 */
> +	if (wait_for((I915_READ(EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL(dev)) &

24ms = frametime for roughly 40Hz. Looks awfully like something Bspec
authors just pulled out of thin air.

Generally our timeout for waiting for one vblank is 50ms (20Hz, which is a
lot less than any sane panel does even with DRRS).

Overall series looks sane, please sign someone up for detailed review.

Thanks, Daniel

> +		      EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) == 0, 24)) {
> +		DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Enable/Re-enable PSR on the host */
>  	intel_edp_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-17 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-16 23:19 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: PSR: organize setup function Rodrigo Vivi
2014-09-16 23:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: PSR: Organize PSR enable function Rodrigo Vivi
2014-09-23 21:05   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-09-24  8:37     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-16 23:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Avoid re-configure panel on every PSR re-enable Rodrigo Vivi
2014-09-24 13:55   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-09-16 23:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Make sure PSR is ready for been re-enabled Rodrigo Vivi
2014-09-17 15:50   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-09-17 16:21     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-09-17 16:22     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-09-17 17:23     ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2014-09-24 15:40       ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-09-24 19:04         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-24 22:16           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-09-25 17:36             ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-09-25 17:50               ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-09-29 12:24                 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-23 20:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: PSR: organize setup function Paulo Zanoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140917155004.GI31703@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox