Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915: add i915_ved.c to setup bridge for VED

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:11:21AM +0000, Cheng, Yao wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel
> > Vetter
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 8:09 PM
> > To: Cheng, Yao
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Kelley,
> > Sean V; Vetter, Daniel; Abel, Michael J; Jiang, Fei; Rao, Ram R
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915: add i915_ved.c to setup
> > bridge for VED
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:36:41PM +0800, Yao Cheng wrote:
> > > Setup minimum required resources during i915_driver_load:
> > > 1. Create a platform device to share MMIO/IRQ resources 2. Make the
> > > platform device child of i915 device for runtime PM.
> > > 3. Create IRQ chip to forward the VED irqs.
> > > VED driver (a standalone drm driver) probes the VED device and creates
> > > a new dri card on install.
> > >
> > > Currently only supports VED on valleyview.
> > > Kerneldoc is updated for i915_ved.c.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yao Cheng <yao.cheng@intel.com>
> > 
> > Please resend with a patch changelog to account for my review comments.
> > And Ville's. Plus cc us both. And if there's anything you didn't address, you
> > must reply to the review and we need to further discuss this.
> > 
> 
> Daniel, I see, thanks for the instruction.
> Do you mean resending the [RFC PATCH v2] with changelog and cc list?
> Or adding changelog/cc when sending [RFC PATCH v3]?

I think you could just add the per-patch changelog for both v2 and v3 when
sending out v3.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch