Re: [PATCH 01/10] drm/amd-kfd: Clean up inline handling

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] drm/amd-kfd: Clean up inline handling
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:35:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160622073537.GJ23520@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFCwf12Yk5pZDQ_n-1XZ4tJW7Q+qS2KTNPfYyw535_vWzENtPQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:11:13PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > - inline functions need to be static inline, otherwise gcc can opt to
> >   not inline and the linker gets unhappy.
> > - no forward decls for inline functions, just include the right headers.
> >
> > Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Ben Goz <ben.goz@amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.h | 4 ++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h                 | 3 ---
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.h
> > index ec4036a09f3e..a625b9137da2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.h
> > @@ -187,12 +187,12 @@ int init_pipelines(struct device_queue_manager *dqm,
> >  unsigned int get_first_pipe(struct device_queue_manager *dqm);
> >  unsigned int get_pipes_num(struct device_queue_manager *dqm);
> >
> > -extern inline unsigned int get_sh_mem_bases_32(struct kfd_process_device *pdd)
> > +static inline unsigned int get_sh_mem_bases_32(struct kfd_process_device *pdd)
> >  {
> >         return (pdd->lds_base >> 16) & 0xFF;
> >  }
> >
> > -extern inline unsigned int
> > +static inline unsigned int
> >  get_sh_mem_bases_nybble_64(struct kfd_process_device *pdd)
> >  {
> >         return (pdd->lds_base >> 60) & 0x0E;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> > index d0d5f4baf72d..80113c335966 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> > @@ -617,10 +617,7 @@ int kgd2kfd_resume(struct kfd_dev *kfd);
> >  int kfd_init_apertures(struct kfd_process *process);
> >
> >  /* Queue Context Management */
> > -inline uint32_t lower_32(uint64_t x);
> > -inline uint32_t upper_32(uint64_t x);
> >  struct cik_sdma_rlc_registers *get_sdma_mqd(void *mqd);
> > -inline uint32_t get_sdma_base_addr(struct cik_sdma_rlc_registers *m);
> >
> >  int init_queue(struct queue **q, struct queue_properties properties);
> >  void uninit_queue(struct queue *q);
> > --
> > 2.8.1
> >
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> Minor comment, please change the commit message title to "drm/amdkfd:
> ..." (without the "-" between amd and kfd), to make this patch
> consistent with all amdkfd patches.
> 
> With that change, this patch is:
> Reviewed-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>

Fixed up and applied, thanks for the review.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel