From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use drm_crtc_vblank_wait_one_vblank instead the legacy one.
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:52:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160804075228.GZ4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lh0doug5.fsf@intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:38:02AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
> > No functional change.
> >
> > This is the last user of legacy function so we will be able
> > to clean up drm_irq.c a bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 50cdc89..37a3ae8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1202,7 +1202,10 @@ intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > static inline void
> > intel_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> > {
> > - drm_wait_one_vblank(dev, pipe);
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > + struct drm_crtc *crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe];
> > +
> > + drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank(crtc);
>
> With these changes, in almost all intel_wait_for_vblank() call paths
> we'll have crtc available, so we end up calling
> intel_wait_for_vblank(intel_crtc->pipe), which will then be converted
> back to drm_crtc via dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe], and again to
> pipe using drm_crtc_index(crtc)...
>
> I'm tempted to say we should *first* replace all intel_wait_for_vblank()
> calls with drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank() where possible. After that, we
> might just call
> drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank(dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe])
> everywhere else.
On a slight tangent, I'd like to see patches to
s/dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]/whatever_is_the_function_name(pipe)/
and make those functions return intel_crtc instead of drm_crtc.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-04 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-03 21:17 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use drm_crtc_vblank_wait_one_vblank instead the legacy one Rodrigo Vivi
2016-08-03 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm: Remove legacy drm_wait_one_vblank(dev, pipe) Rodrigo Vivi
2016-08-04 5:40 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Use drm_crtc_vblank_wait_one_vblank instead the legacy one Patchwork
2016-08-04 7:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Jani Nikula
2016-08-04 7:52 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160804075228.GZ4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox