From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 14:33:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170508113358.GP12629@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170504131930.f47qqrwfbadsciq7@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 03:20:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:09:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for
> > > the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic
> > > semantics, i915 has some nice sanity checks to make sure we keep
> > > getting this right. Move them over too.
> > >
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 10 ++++++----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 11 ++---------
> > > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > > index 89f0928b042a..942183a2aa3c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > > @@ -775,8 +775,10 @@ bool drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > /* If mode timing undefined, just return as no-op:
> > > * Happens during initial modesetting of a crtc.
> > > */
> > > - if (mode->crtc_clock == 0) {
> > > + if (WARN_ON(mode->crtc_clock == 0)) {
> > > DRM_DEBUG("crtc %u: Noop due to uninitialized mode.\n", pipe);
> > > + WARN_ON(drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev));
> >
> > I would make these _ONCE() otherwise the machine might end up
> > practically dead.
>
> Will do.
>
> > > +
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -1338,6 +1340,10 @@ void drm_crtc_vblank_off(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > > send_vblank_event(dev, e, seq, &now);
> > > }
> > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, irqflags);
> > > +
> > > + /* Will be reset by the modeset helpers when re-enabling the crtc by
> > > + * calling drm_calc_timestamping_constants(). */
> > > + vblank->hwmode.crtc_clock = 0;
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_crtc_vblank_off);
> >
> > Shouldn't we do this in drm_crtc_vblank_reset() as well?
> >
> > Hmm. Except we call that after drm_calc_timestamping_constants(). I
> > guess we should be able to move the reset() into
> > intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(). And possibly move the vblank_on()
> > call as well?
>
> Yeah, it'd be nice to clean this stuff up some more, but there's also the
> problem that legacy and new drivers callc drm_calc_timestamping_constants
> at opposite ends of the modeset sequence. Doing more here is a bunch more
> work, maybe for the next patche series ...
>
> I don't think we need to call it in _reset, at least at boot-up it should
> be 0 already. And for s/r we already shut down the pipe on suspend, so
> it's gone through this here.
Hmm. Indeed that seems like it should cover it.
>
> With the _ONCE nit address (and the build breakage I've introduced in this
> version fixed), ack from you on the entire series?
Sure, for the series
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-08 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-03 7:26 [PATCH 0/5] vblanke cleanup resend Daniel Vetter
2017-05-03 7:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/vblank: Switch drm_driver->get_vblank_timestamp to return a bool Daniel Vetter
2017-05-03 7:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/vblank: Switch to bool in_vblank_irq in get_vblank_timestamp Daniel Vetter
2017-05-04 10:08 ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-03 7:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/vblank: Add FIXME comments about moving the vblank ts hooks Daniel Vetter
2017-05-03 7:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/vblank: drop the mode argument from drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos Daniel Vetter
2017-05-03 7:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more Daniel Vetter
2017-05-03 14:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-05-04 13:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-08 11:33 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-05-03 7:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for vblanke cleanup resend Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-09 14:03 [PATCH 1/5] drm/vblank: Switch drm_driver->get_vblank_timestamp to return a bool Daniel Vetter
2017-05-09 14:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170508113358.GP12629@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox