From: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:20:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919212021.GA25624@shiv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919195524.2ecgoxssc2wp4oge@intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:55:24PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 06:19:12PM +0000, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > The patch looks good for eDP link training optimizations.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>
> I haven't merged this patch yet because I'd like an Ack from Jani.
>
> Also I'd like to hear from Mika if he believes it is safe or not.
Mika looked at it a few months ago and thought it would be ok. It
can't hurt to have him look at it again, though.
> On his revert commit he wrote:
> "It has been found out that in some HW combination the DisplayPort
> fast link training feature caused screen flickering. Let's revert
> this feature for now until we can ensure that the feature works for
> all platforms."
>
> I don't want to merge this patch to fix a feature that is disabled
> by default with the risk of bringing flickerings back.
>
> But even if we decide to go ahead and merge I believe we need to
> resend the test and collect a full round of CI that now runs
> all IGT tests.
I assume you mean resend the patch here. I'll do that.
Jim
> Thanks,
> Rodrigo.
>
>
> >
> > Manasi
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 09:34:46AM -0700, Jim Bride wrote:
> > > This set of changes has some history to them. There were several attempts
> > > to add what was called "fast link training" to i915, which actually wasn't
> > > fast link training as per the DP spec. These changes were:
> > >
> > > commit 5fa836a9d859 ("drm/i915: DP link training optimization")
> > > commit 4e96c97742f4 ("drm/i915: eDP link training optimization")
> > >
> > > which were eventually hand-reverted by:
> > >
> > > commit 34511dce4b35 ("drm/i915: Revert DisplayPort fast link training
> > > feature")
> > >
> > > in kernel 4.7-rc4. The eDP pieces of the above revert, however, had some
> > > very bad side-effects on PSR functionality on Skylake. The issue at
> > > hand is that when PSR exits i915 briefly emits TP1 followed by TP2/3
> > > (depending on the original link configuration) in order to quickly get
> > > the source and sink back in synchronization across the link before handing
> > > control back to the i915. There's an assumption that none of the link
> > > configuration information has changed (and thus it's still valid) since the
> > > last full link training operation. The revert above was identified via a
> > > bisect as the cause of some of Skylake's PSR woes. This patch, largely
> > > based on commit 4e96c97742f4 ("drm/i915: eDP link training optimization")
> > > puts the eDP portions of this patch back in place. None of the flickering
> > > issues that spurred the revert have been seen, and I suspect the real
> > > culprits here were addressed by some of the recent link training changes
> > > that Manasi has implemented, and PSR on Skylake is definitely more happy
> > > with these changes in-place.
> > >
> > > v2 and v3: Rebase
> > > v4: * Clean up accesses to train_set_valid a bit for easier
> > > reading. (Chris)
> > > * Rebase
> > > v5: * Checkpatch cleanup
> > > * Rebase
> > > v6: * is_edp() => intel_dp_is_edp()
> > > * rebase
> > > v7: * Remove extraneous is_edp() prototype (Rodrigo)
> > >
> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Manasi D Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > > Fixes: 34511dce4 ("drm/i915: Revert DisplayPort fast link training feature")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 ++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > index e385658..38bc7e0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -4750,6 +4750,7 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
> > > intel_dp->max_link_rate = intel_dp_max_common_rate(intel_dp);
> > >
> > > intel_dp->reset_link_params = false;
> > > + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > intel_dp_print_rates(intel_dp);
> > > @@ -6019,6 +6020,7 @@ intel_dp_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> > > intel_dp_set_source_rates(intel_dp);
> > >
> > > intel_dp->reset_link_params = true;
> > > + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> > > intel_dp->pps_pipe = INVALID_PIPE;
> > > intel_dp->active_pipe = INVALID_PIPE;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > > index 05907fa..79fe369 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > > @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ static bool
> > > intel_dp_reset_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > uint8_t dp_train_pat)
> > > {
> > > - memset(intel_dp->train_set, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->train_set));
> > > + if (!intel_dp->train_set_valid)
> > > + memset(intel_dp->train_set, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->train_set));
> > > intel_dp_set_signal_levels(intel_dp);
> > > return intel_dp_set_link_train(intel_dp, dp_train_pat);
> > > }
> > > @@ -162,9 +163,18 @@ intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_1 |
> > > DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE)) {
> > > DRM_ERROR("failed to enable link training\n");
> > > + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * The initial set of link parameters are set by this point, so go
> > > + * ahead and set intel_dp->train_set_valid to false in case any of
> > > + * the succeeding steps fail. It will be set back to true if we were
> > > + * able to achieve clock recovery in the specified configuration.
> > > + */
> > > + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> > > +
> > > voltage_tries = 1;
> > > max_vswing_tries = 0;
> > > for (;;) {
> > > @@ -179,6 +189,7 @@ intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > >
> > > if (drm_dp_clock_recovery_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count)) {
> > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("clock recovery OK\n");
> > > + intel_dp->train_set_valid = intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp);
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -256,6 +267,7 @@ intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > training_pattern |
> > > DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE)) {
> > > DRM_ERROR("failed to start channel equalization\n");
> > > + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -296,6 +308,7 @@ intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > /* Try 5 times, else fail and try at lower BW */
> > > if (tries == 5) {
> > > intel_dp_dump_link_status(link_status);
> > > + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Channel equalization failed 5 times\n");
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > index 2940d39..f4354ec 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > @@ -995,6 +995,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
> > > struct drm_dp_aux aux;
> > > enum intel_display_power_domain aux_power_domain;
> > > uint8_t train_set[4];
> > > + bool train_set_valid;
> > > int panel_power_up_delay;
> > > int panel_power_down_delay;
> > > int panel_power_cycle_delay;
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-19 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-09 21:21 [PATCH v5] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP Jim Bride
2017-08-09 21:40 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-08-16 22:13 ` [PATCH v5] " Manasi Navare
2017-08-17 17:50 ` Jim Bride
2017-08-17 19:20 ` Manasi Navare
2017-08-17 19:52 ` Manasi Navare
2017-08-17 19:54 ` Jim Bride
2017-08-21 21:03 ` [PATCH v6] " Jim Bride
2017-08-21 23:27 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2017-08-22 16:32 ` Jim Bride
2017-08-21 21:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP (rev2) Patchwork
2017-08-22 16:34 ` [PATCH v7] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP Jim Bride
2017-09-15 18:19 ` Manasi Navare
2017-09-19 19:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-09-19 21:20 ` Jim Bride [this message]
2017-09-27 12:23 ` Mika Kahola
2017-09-28 0:25 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-08-22 17:36 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP (rev3) Patchwork
2017-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH v8] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP Jim Bride
2017-09-19 22:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP (rev4) Patchwork
2017-09-25 23:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-09-26 4:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170919212021.GA25624@shiv \
--to=jim.bride@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox