From: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] HAX Enable GuC Submission for CI
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 13:50:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213125046.1735-8-michal.winiarski@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171213125046.1735-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Also:
Revert "drm/i915/GuC/GLK: Load GuC on GLK"
Now that we no longer have fallback to execlists submission available,
if the firmware is selected by the driver but is not available on the
system (like in this case - where the FW is not yet released), we're
unable to get a clean CI run.
This reverts commit 90f192c8241e431d2c3076e4f2cb99ac25bfb1c5.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c | 9 ---------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
index 792ce26d7449..9725c5ad8ac6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
param(int, disable_power_well, -1) \
param(int, enable_ips, 1) \
param(int, invert_brightness, 0) \
- param(int, enable_guc, 0) \
+ param(int, enable_guc, -1) \
param(int, guc_log_level, -1) \
param(char *, guc_firmware_path, NULL) \
param(char *, huc_firmware_path, NULL) \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
index cbc51c960425..3b0932942857 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
@@ -39,9 +39,6 @@
#define KBL_FW_MAJOR 9
#define KBL_FW_MINOR 39
-#define GLK_FW_MAJOR 10
-#define GLK_FW_MINOR 56
-
#define GUC_FW_PATH(platform, major, minor) \
"i915/" __stringify(platform) "_guc_ver" __stringify(major) "_" __stringify(minor) ".bin"
@@ -54,8 +51,6 @@ MODULE_FIRMWARE(I915_BXT_GUC_UCODE);
#define I915_KBL_GUC_UCODE GUC_FW_PATH(kbl, KBL_FW_MAJOR, KBL_FW_MINOR)
MODULE_FIRMWARE(I915_KBL_GUC_UCODE);
-#define I915_GLK_GUC_UCODE GUC_FW_PATH(glk, GLK_FW_MAJOR, GLK_FW_MINOR)
-
static void guc_fw_select(struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = container_of(guc_fw, struct intel_guc, fw);
@@ -82,10 +77,6 @@ static void guc_fw_select(struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw)
guc_fw->path = I915_KBL_GUC_UCODE;
guc_fw->major_ver_wanted = KBL_FW_MAJOR;
guc_fw->minor_ver_wanted = KBL_FW_MINOR;
- } else if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
- guc_fw->path = I915_GLK_GUC_UCODE;
- guc_fw->major_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MAJOR;
- guc_fw->minor_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MINOR;
} else {
DRM_WARN("%s: No firmware known for this platform!\n",
intel_uc_fw_type_repr(guc_fw->type));
--
2.14.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-13 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 12:50 [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/guc: Move shared data allocation away from submission path Michał Winiarski
2017-12-13 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex Michał Winiarski
2017-12-13 15:23 ` Chris Wilson
2017-12-13 16:00 ` Chris Wilson
2017-12-13 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/i915/guc: Extract guc_init from guc_init_hw Michał Winiarski
2017-12-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/guc: Call invalidate after changing the vfunc Michał Winiarski
2017-12-13 15:24 ` Chris Wilson
2017-12-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/guc: Extract doorbell creation from client allocation Michał Winiarski
2017-12-13 19:03 ` Michel Thierry
2017-12-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/guc: Extract clients allocation to submission_init Michał Winiarski
2017-12-13 19:10 ` Michel Thierry
2017-12-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/guc: Extract doorbell verification into a function Michał Winiarski
2017-12-13 15:23 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2017-12-13 19:10 ` Michel Thierry
2017-12-13 12:50 ` Michał Winiarski [this message]
2017-12-13 18:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] HAX Enable GuC Submission for CI Chris Wilson
2017-12-13 15:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/8] drm/i915/guc: Move shared data allocation away from submission path Patchwork
2017-12-13 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/8] " Chris Wilson
2017-12-13 17:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/8] " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-28 9:56 [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Separate GuC/HuC specific functionality from intel_uc Sagar Arun Kamble
2017-08-28 9:56 ` [PATCH 8/8] HAX enable guc submission for CI Sagar Arun Kamble
2017-05-22 22:07 [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/i915: Remove misleading comment in request_alloc Michał Winiarski
2017-05-22 22:07 ` [PATCH 8/8] HAX: Enable GuC submission for CI Michał Winiarski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171213125046.1735-8-michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--to=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox