From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/doc: Move legacy kms helpers to the very end
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:27:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171215102747.GQ26573@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_N0r3D=H45WCSskCfQVtrizp_Nqbbkcy7Puquf_adhnQw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:11:01PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst
> > index 420025bd6a9b..cbba93483aec 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst
> > @@ -263,10 +263,10 @@ Taken all together there's two consequences for the atomic design:
> >
> > - An atomic update is assembled and validated as an entirely free-standing pile
> > of structures within the :c:type:`drm_atomic_state <drm_atomic_state>`
> > - container. Again drivers can subclass that container for their own state
> > - structure tracking needs. Only when a state is committed is it applied to the
> > - driver and modeset objects. This way rolling back an update boils down to
> > - releasing memory and unreferencing objects like framebuffers.
> > + container. Driver private state structures are also tracked in the same
> > + structure, see the next chapter. Only when a state is committed is it applied
>
> I think it would be clearer as:
> structure (see the next chapter).
> or
> structure; see the next chapter.
>
> Either way:
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Thanks for all the review from you and DK, all taken into account and
merged.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-15 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-14 20:30 [PATCH 0/5] bunch of drm kernel-doc patches Daniel Vetter
2017-12-14 20:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/edid: kerneldoc for is_hdmi2_sink Daniel Vetter
2017-12-15 1:59 ` Alex Deucher
2017-12-14 20:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/print: Unconfuse kerneldoc Daniel Vetter
2017-12-15 2:00 ` Alex Deucher
2017-12-14 20:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/syncobj: some kerneldoc polish Daniel Vetter
2017-12-15 2:06 ` Alex Deucher
2017-12-14 20:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: document how to handle driver private objects Daniel Vetter
2017-12-15 1:57 ` Alex Deucher
2017-12-18 16:09 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-12-19 10:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-15 2:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-12-18 16:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-12-19 10:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-19 13:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-12-19 14:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-19 14:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-12-14 20:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/doc: Move legacy kms helpers to the very end Daniel Vetter
2017-12-15 2:11 ` Alex Deucher
2017-12-15 10:27 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2017-12-14 20:57 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for bunch of drm kernel-doc patches Patchwork
2017-12-14 22:21 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171215102747.GQ26573@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox