From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Move the irq_counter inside the spinlock
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 21:24:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180115212455.24046-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180115212455.24046-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Rather than have multiple locked instructions inside the notify_ring()
irq handler, move them inside the spinlock and reduce their intrinsic
locking.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 13 ++++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index 836db90ef81b..08bbd56277e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ static bool __i915_spin_request(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
* takes to sleep on a request, on the order of a microsecond.
*/
- irq = atomic_read(&engine->irq_count);
+ irq = READ_ONCE(engine->breadcrumbs.irq_count);
timeout_us += local_clock_us(&cpu);
do {
if (i915_seqno_passed(intel_engine_get_seqno(engine), seqno))
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ static bool __i915_spin_request(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
* assume we won't see one in the near future but require
* the engine->seqno_barrier() to fixup coherency.
*/
- if (atomic_read(&engine->irq_count) != irq)
+ if (READ_ONCE(engine->breadcrumbs.irq_count) != irq)
break;
if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 0b272501b738..e5f76d580010 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1073,9 +1073,6 @@ static void notify_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
if (unlikely(!engine->breadcrumbs.irq_armed))
return;
- atomic_inc(&engine->irq_count);
- set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted);
-
rcu_read_lock();
spin_lock(&engine->breadcrumbs.irq_lock);
@@ -1107,6 +1104,9 @@ static void notify_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
i915_seqno_passed(seqno, wait->seqno - 1))
tsk = wait->tsk;
}
+
+ engine->breadcrumbs.irq_count++;
+ __set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted);
} else {
if (engine->breadcrumbs.irq_armed)
__intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs(engine);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index e3667dc1e96d..7c82cfe23922 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -98,12 +98,14 @@ static void intel_breadcrumbs_hangcheck(struct timer_list *t)
struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
from_timer(engine, t, breadcrumbs.hangcheck);
struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
+ unsigned int irq_count;
if (!b->irq_armed)
return;
- if (b->hangcheck_interrupts != atomic_read(&engine->irq_count)) {
- b->hangcheck_interrupts = atomic_read(&engine->irq_count);
+ irq_count = READ_ONCE(b->irq_count);
+ if (b->hangcheck_interrupts != irq_count) {
+ b->hangcheck_interrupts = irq_count;
mod_timer(&b->hangcheck, wait_timeout());
return;
}
@@ -176,7 +178,7 @@ static void irq_enable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
* we still need to force the barrier before reading the seqno,
* just in case.
*/
- set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted);
+ __set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted);
/* Caller disables interrupts */
spin_lock(&engine->i915->irq_lock);
@@ -270,13 +272,14 @@ static bool use_fake_irq(const struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
if (!test_bit(engine->id, &engine->i915->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings))
return false;
- /* Only start with the heavy weight fake irq timer if we have not
+ /*
+ * Only start with the heavy weight fake irq timer if we have not
* seen any interrupts since enabling it the first time. If the
* interrupts are still arriving, it means we made a mistake in our
* engine->seqno_barrier(), a timing error that should be transient
* and unlikely to reoccur.
*/
- return atomic_read(&engine->irq_count) == b->hangcheck_interrupts;
+ return READ_ONCE(b->irq_count) == b->hangcheck_interrupts;
}
static void enable_fake_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index c5ff203e42d6..f406d0ff4612 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -305,7 +305,6 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
struct drm_i915_gem_object *default_state;
- atomic_t irq_count;
unsigned long irq_posted;
#define ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB 0
#define ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST 1
@@ -340,6 +339,7 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
unsigned int hangcheck_interrupts;
unsigned int irq_enabled;
+ unsigned int irq_count;
bool irq_armed : 1;
I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(bool mock : 1);
--
2.15.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-15 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-15 21:24 Prevent trivial oom from gem_exec_nop/sequential Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 21:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Only attempt to scan the requested number of shrinker slabs Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 10:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-18 9:16 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-18 9:19 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 21:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Move i915_gem_retire_work_handler Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 10:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-15 21:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Shrink the GEM kmem_caches upon idling Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 10:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 10:19 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 13:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 15:12 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 15:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 15:21 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 17:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 17:36 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 10:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-18 18:06 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 21:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: Shrink the request kmem_cache on allocation error Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 10:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 10:26 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 13:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 15:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-15 21:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Trim the retired request queue after submitting Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 10:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 10:32 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 10:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 13:30 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 21:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Drop request reference for the signaler thread Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 21:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: Reduce spinlock hold time during notify_ring() interrupt Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 10:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-18 18:08 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-18 18:10 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 21:24 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2018-01-17 12:12 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Move the irq_counter inside the spinlock Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-15 21:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Only signal from interrupt when requested Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 12:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-18 18:12 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 21:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Reduce signaler rbtree to a sorted list Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 22:04 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [01/10] drm/i915: Only attempt to scan the requested number of shrinker slabs Patchwork
2018-01-16 9:21 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-01-16 9:52 ` Prevent trivial oom from gem_exec_nop/sequential Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 10:02 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 13:10 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 13:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [01/10] drm/i915: Only attempt to scan the requested number of shrinker slabs (rev3) Patchwork
2018-01-16 14:02 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [01/10] drm/i915: Only attempt to scan the requested number of shrinker slabs (rev4) Patchwork
2018-01-16 15:29 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180115212455.24046-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox