Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915: Check hdcp key loadability
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:28:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180409082855.GJ31310@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180406160202.GP5453@intel.com>

On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:02:02PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 02:35:42PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Thursday 29 March 2018 07:54 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 07:39:07PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> > >> HDCP1.4 key can be loaded, only when Power well #1 is enabled and cdclk
> > >> is enabled. Using the I915 power well infrastruture, above requirement
> > >> is verified.
> > >>
> > >> This patch enables the hdcp initialization for HSW, BDW, and BXT.
> > >>
> > >> v2:
> > >>    Choose the PW# based on the platform.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> > >> ---
> > >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >>   1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
> > >> index f77d956b2b18..d8af09b46a44 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
> > >> @@ -37,6 +37,43 @@ static int intel_hdcp_poll_ksv_fifo(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> > >>   	return 0;
> > >>   }
> > >>   
> > >> +static bool hdcp_key_loadable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > >> +{
> > >> +	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
> > >> +	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> > >> +	enum i915_power_well_id id;
> > >> +	bool enabled = false;
> > >> +
> > >> +	/*
> > >> +	 * On HSW and BDW, Display HW loads the Key as soon as Display resumes.
> > >> +	 * On all BXT+, SW can load the keys only when the PW#1 is turned on.
> > >> +	 */
> > >> +	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
> > >> +		id = HSW_DISP_PW_GLOBAL;
> > >> +	else
> > >> +		id = SKL_DISP_PW_1;
> > >> +
> > >> +	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
> > >> +
> > >> +	/* PG1 (power well #1) needs to be enabled */
> > >> +	for_each_power_well(dev_priv, power_well) {
> > >> +		if (power_well->id == id) {
> > >> +			enabled = power_well->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv,
> > >> +							      power_well);
> > >> +			break;
> > >> +		}
> > >> +	}
> > >> +	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
> > >> +
> > >> +	/*
> > >> +	 * Another req for hdcp key loadability is enabled state of pll for
> > >> +	 * cdclk. Without active crtc we wont land here. So we are assuming that
> > >> +	 * cdclk is already on.
> > >> +	 */
> > >> +
> > >> +	return enabled;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >>   static void intel_hdcp_clear_keys(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > >>   {
> > >>   	I915_WRITE(HDCP_KEY_CONF, HDCP_CLEAR_KEYS_TRIGGER);
> > >> @@ -615,8 +652,8 @@ static int _intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_connector *connector)
> > >>   	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[%s:%d] HDCP is being enabled...\n",
> > >>   		      connector->base.name, connector->base.base.id);
> > >>   
> > >> -	if (!(I915_READ(SKL_FUSE_STATUS) & SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(1))) {
> > >> -		DRM_ERROR("PG1 is disabled, cannot load keys\n");
> > >> +	if (!hdcp_key_loadable(dev_priv)) {
> > >> +		DRM_ERROR("HDCP key Load is not possible\n");
> > >>   		return -ENXIO;
> > >>   	}
> > > If you need the power well then why aren't you grabbing the correct
> > > power domain reference somewhere?
> > 
> > Ville,
> > 
> > As HDCP is supposed to be enabled after the basic display is up, power well #1 is supposed to be enabled.
> > If not that is mostly an error w.r.t HDCP.
> > 
> > So at this point we just want to verify whether required PW is up and HDCP key can be loaded from the HW. Else fail the HDCP request.
> 
> So this is in practice dead code to deal with a hypothetical bug
> elsewhere in the driver?

Yeah looks like it should be wrapped in a WARN_ON, or maybe outright
thrown out. The unclaimed mmio debug stuff will catch when this happens
(or well, should).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-09  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-29 14:09 [PATCH v2 0/4] HDCP1.4 fixes Ramalingam C
2018-03-29 14:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915: Read HDCP R0 thrice in case of mismatch Ramalingam C
2018-03-29 14:35   ` Sean Paul
2018-04-02  9:08     ` Ramalingam C
2018-03-29 14:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915: Read Vprime thrice incase " Ramalingam C
2018-03-29 14:38   ` Sean Paul
2018-04-02  9:16     ` Ramalingam C
2018-03-29 14:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915: Check hdcp key loadability Ramalingam C
2018-03-29 14:24   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-04-02  9:05     ` Ramalingam C
2018-04-06 16:02       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-04-09  8:28         ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-04-11  8:27           ` Ramalingam C
2018-04-13 15:49             ` Daniel Vetter
2018-03-29 14:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Fix downstream dev count read Ramalingam C
2018-03-29 14:39   ` Sean Paul
2018-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] HDCP1.4 fixes Ramalingam C
2018-03-29 14:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for HDCP1.4 fixes (rev3) Patchwork
2018-03-29 17:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180409082855.GJ31310@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox