Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, ppaalanen@gmail.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 06/11] drm: Add DRM client cap for aspect-ratio
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 17:07:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180420140725.GB13908@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524231111-17440-7-git-send-email-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:01:46PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> 
> To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the aspect
> ratio information along with mode, can break things in existing
> user-spaces which have no intention or support to use this aspect
> ratio information.
> 
> To avoid this, a new drm client cap is required to enable a
> user-space to advertise if it supports modes with aspect-ratio. Based
> on this cap value, the kernel will take a call on exposing the aspect
> ratio info in modes or not.
> 
> This patch adds the client cap for aspect-ratio.
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> 
> V3: rebase
> V4: As suggested by Marteen Lankhorst modified the commit message
>     explaining the need to use the DRM cap for aspect-ratio. Also,
>     tweaked the comment lines in the code for better understanding and
>     clarity, as recommended by Shashank Sharma.
> V5: rebase
> V6: rebase
> V7: rebase
> V8: rebase
> V9: rebase
> V10: added comment explaining that no userspace breaks on aspect-ratio
>      mode bits.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 9 +++++++++
>  include/drm/drm_file.h      | 8 ++++++++
>  include/uapi/drm/drm.h      | 7 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> index af78291..39c8eab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> @@ -325,6 +325,15 @@ drm_setclientcap(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv)
>  		file_priv->atomic = req->value;
>  		file_priv->universal_planes = req->value;
>  		break;
> +	case DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ASPECT_RATIO:
> +		if (req->value > 1)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +	/*
> +	 * No Atomic userspace blows up on aspect ratio mode bits. Checked in
> +	 * wayland/weston, xserver, and hardware-composer modeset paths.
> +	 */

Bogus indentation.

Also where's the aspect_ratio_allowed handling for the atomic cap?
Or did we decide against it after all?

> +		file_priv->aspect_ratio_allowed = req->value;
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> index 5176c37..02b7dde 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> @@ -182,6 +182,14 @@ struct drm_file {
>  	unsigned atomic:1;
>  
>  	/**
> +	 * @aspect_ratio_allowed:
> +	 *
> +	 * True, if client can handle picture aspect ratios, and has requested
> +	 * to pass this information along with the mode.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned aspect_ratio_allowed:1;
> +
> +	/**
>  	 * @is_master:
>  	 *
>  	 * This client is the creator of @master. Protected by struct
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> index 6fdff59..9c660e1 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> @@ -680,6 +680,13 @@ struct drm_get_cap {
>   */
>  #define DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ATOMIC	3
>  
> +/**
> + * DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ASPECT_RATIO
> + *
> + * If set to 1, the DRM core will provide aspect ratio information in modes.
> + */
> +#define DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ASPECT_RATIO    4
> +
>  /** DRM_IOCTL_SET_CLIENT_CAP ioctl argument type */
>  struct drm_set_client_cap {
>  	__u64 capability;
> -- 
> 2.7.4

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-20 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-20 13:31 [PATCH v11 00/11] Aspect ratio support in DRM layer Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 01/11] drm/modes: Introduce drm_mode_match() Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 02/11] drm/edid: Use drm_mode_match_no_clocks_no_stereo() for consistentcy Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 03/11] drm/edid: Fix cea mode aspect ratio handling Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 04/11] drm/edid: Don't send bogus aspect ratios in AVI infoframes Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 05/11] video/hdmi: Reject illegal picture aspect ratios Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 06/11] drm: Add DRM client cap for aspect-ratio Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 14:07   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-04-23  5:13     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-23 10:11       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-04-26 14:23         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 07/11] drm: Add helper functions to handle aspect-ratio flag bits Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 14:12   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-04-23  5:25     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-23 10:13       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-04-24  4:10         ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-23 10:22       ` Jani Nikula
2018-04-24  4:01         ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 08/11] drm: Handle aspect ratio info in legacy and atomic modeset paths Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 09/11] drm: Expose modes with aspect ratio, only if requested Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 14:22   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-04-23  5:49     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-23 10:16       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 10/11] drm: Add aspect ratio parsing in DRM layer Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 13:31 ` [PATCH v11 11/11] drm: Add and handle new aspect ratios " Nautiyal, Ankit K
2018-04-20 16:34 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Aspect ratio support " Patchwork
2018-04-20 16:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-04-20 18:03 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180420140725.GB13908@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ppaalanen@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox