From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/dp: group link config limits in a struct
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:07:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180425190741.GI31618@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <954d80e8a412c177fd25f56c2a7599f3dce00b5b.1522938790.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:39:03PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Also use same min/max model for bpp, and adjust debug logging while at
> it.
>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index dd42e0422af6..3c5fbdf42b9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1647,6 +1647,12 @@ void intel_dp_compute_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int port_clock,
> }
> }
>
> +struct link_config_limits {
> + int min_clock, max_clock;
> + int min_lane_count, max_lane_count;
> + int min_bpp, max_bpp;
> +};
> +
> static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> {
> @@ -1704,21 +1710,25 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> {
> struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode;
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&encoder->base);
> - int lane_count, clock;
> - int min_lane_count = 1;
> - int max_lane_count = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
> - int min_clock = 0;
> - int max_clock;
> - int bpp, mode_rate;
> - int link_avail, link_clock;
> + struct link_config_limits limits;
> + int bpp, clock, lane_count;
> + int mode_rate, link_avail, link_clock;
> int common_len;
> +
> common_len = intel_dp_common_len_rate_limit(intel_dp,
> intel_dp->max_link_rate);
>
> /* No common link rates between source and sink */
> WARN_ON(common_len <= 0);
>
> - max_clock = common_len - 1;
> + limits.min_clock = 0;
> + limits.max_clock = common_len - 1;
> +
> + limits.min_lane_count = 1;
> + limits.max_lane_count = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
> +
> + limits.min_bpp = 6 * 3;
> + limits.max_bpp = intel_dp_compute_bpp(intel_dp, pipe_config);
>
> /* Use values requested by Compliance Test Request */
> if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> @@ -1733,18 +1743,11 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> if (index >= 0)
> - min_clock = max_clock = index;
> - min_lane_count = max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> + limits.min_clock = limits.max_clock = index;
> + limits.min_lane_count = limits.max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> }
> }
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
> - "max bw %d pixel clock %iKHz\n",
> - max_lane_count, intel_dp->common_rates[max_clock],
> - adjusted_mode->crtc_clock);
>
> - /* Walk through all bpp values. Luckily they're all nicely spaced with 2
> - * bpc in between. */
> - bpp = intel_dp_compute_bpp(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> /*
> * Use the maximum clock and number of lanes the eDP panel
> @@ -1753,18 +1756,24 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> * configuration, and typically these values correspond to the
> * native resolution of the panel.
> */
> - min_lane_count = max_lane_count;
> - min_clock = max_clock;
> + limits.min_lane_count = limits.max_lane_count;
> + limits.min_clock = limits.max_clock;
> }
>
> - for (; bpp >= 6*3; bpp -= 2*3) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
> + "max rate %d max bpp %d pixel clock %iKHz\n",
> + limits.max_lane_count,
> + intel_dp->common_rates[limits.max_clock],
> + limits.max_bpp, adjusted_mode->crtc_clock);
> +
> + for (bpp = limits.max_bpp; bpp >= limits.min_bpp; bpp -= 2 * 3) {
> mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> bpp);
>
> - for (clock = min_clock; clock <= max_clock; clock++) {
> - for (lane_count = min_lane_count;
> - lane_count <= max_lane_count;
> - lane_count <<= 1) {
> + for (clock = limits.min_clock; clock <= limits.max_clock; clock++) {
> + for (lane_count = limits.min_lane_count;
> + lane_count <= limits.max_lane_count;
> + lane_count <<= 1) {
>
> link_clock = intel_dp->common_rates[clock];
> link_avail = intel_dp_max_data_rate(link_clock,
> --
> 2.11.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-05 14:38 [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915/dp: link config compute refactoring Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/dp: remove stale comment about bw constants Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 17:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-05 18:46 ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/dp: move link_bw and rate_select debugging where used Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 17:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-05 19:03 ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/dp: abstract dp link config computation from the rest Jani Nikula
2018-04-25 19:03 ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/dp: move eDP VBT bpp claming code to intel_dp_compute_bpp() Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 19:44 ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/dp: group link config limits in a struct Jani Nikula
2018-04-25 19:07 ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/dp: abstract link config selection Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 19:55 ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-09 14:12 ` Jani Nikula
2018-04-09 18:22 ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-26 1:43 ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/dp: fix compliance test adjustments Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 19:59 ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: link config compute refactoring Patchwork
2018-04-05 15:06 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-04-05 18:35 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180425190741.GI31618@intel.com \
--to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox