Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Include priority and completed status in request in/out tracepoints
Date: Fri,  4 May 2018 12:56:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180504115643.22437-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

It is useful to see the priority as requests are coming in and completed
status as requests are coming out of the GPU.

To achieve this in a more readable way we need to abandon the common
request_hw tracepoint class.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 408827bf5d96..77ee5e53eb32 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -679,45 +679,68 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(i915_request, i915_request_execute,
 	     TP_ARGS(rq)
 );
 
-DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_request_hw,
-		    TP_PROTO(struct i915_request *rq, unsigned int port),
-		    TP_ARGS(rq, port),
-
-		    TP_STRUCT__entry(
-				     __field(u32, dev)
-				     __field(u32, hw_id)
-				     __field(u32, ring)
-				     __field(u32, ctx)
-				     __field(u32, seqno)
-				     __field(u32, global_seqno)
-				     __field(u32, port)
-				    ),
-
-		    TP_fast_assign(
-				   __entry->dev = rq->i915->drm.primary->index;
-				   __entry->hw_id = rq->ctx->hw_id;
-				   __entry->ring = rq->engine->id;
-				   __entry->ctx = rq->fence.context;
-				   __entry->seqno = rq->fence.seqno;
-				   __entry->global_seqno = rq->global_seqno;
-				   __entry->port = port;
-				  ),
-
-		    TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
-			      __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring,
-			      __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
-			      __entry->global_seqno, __entry->port)
-);
+TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_in,
+	    TP_PROTO(struct i915_request *rq, unsigned int port),
+	    TP_ARGS(rq, port),
+
+	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
+			     __field(u32, dev)
+			     __field(u32, hw_id)
+			     __field(u32, ring)
+			     __field(u32, ctx)
+			     __field(u32, seqno)
+			     __field(u32, global_seqno)
+			     __field(u32, port)
+			     __field(u32, prio)
+			    ),
 
-DEFINE_EVENT(i915_request_hw, i915_request_in,
-	     TP_PROTO(struct i915_request *rq, unsigned int port),
-	     TP_ARGS(rq, port)
+	    TP_fast_assign(
+			   __entry->dev = rq->i915->drm.primary->index;
+			   __entry->hw_id = rq->ctx->hw_id;
+			   __entry->ring = rq->engine->id;
+			   __entry->ctx = rq->fence.context;
+			   __entry->seqno = rq->fence.seqno;
+			   __entry->global_seqno = rq->global_seqno;
+			   __entry->prio = rq->sched.attr.priority;
+			   __entry->port = port;
+			   ),
+
+	    TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, prio=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
+		      __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx,
+		      __entry->seqno, __entry->prio, __entry->global_seqno,
+		      __entry->port)
 );
 
-DEFINE_EVENT(i915_request, i915_request_out,
-	     TP_PROTO(struct i915_request *rq),
-	     TP_ARGS(rq)
+TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_out,
+	    TP_PROTO(struct i915_request *rq),
+	    TP_ARGS(rq),
+
+	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
+			     __field(u32, dev)
+			     __field(u32, hw_id)
+			     __field(u32, ring)
+			     __field(u32, ctx)
+			     __field(u32, seqno)
+			     __field(u32, global_seqno)
+			     __field(u32, completed)
+			    ),
+
+	    TP_fast_assign(
+			   __entry->dev = rq->i915->drm.primary->index;
+			   __entry->hw_id = rq->ctx->hw_id;
+			   __entry->ring = rq->engine->id;
+			   __entry->ctx = rq->fence.context;
+			   __entry->seqno = rq->fence.seqno;
+			   __entry->global_seqno = rq->global_seqno;
+			   __entry->completed = i915_request_completed(rq);
+			   ),
+
+		    TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, completed?=%u",
+			      __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring,
+			      __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
+			      __entry->global_seqno, __entry->completed)
 );
+
 #else
 #if !defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
 static inline void
-- 
2.14.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2018-05-04 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-04 11:56 Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-05-04 12:05 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Include priority and completed status in request in/out tracepoints Chris Wilson
2018-05-04 12:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-05-04 12:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-04 14:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180504115643.22437-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox