From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ayan Halder <ayan.halder@arm.com>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: Query about INTEL modifiers referred in intel_display.c
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 15:31:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517123159.GG23723@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180517105547.GA4328@arm.com>
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:55:47AM +0100, Ayan Halder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was going through drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c to get an
> understanding about how framebuffer modifiers are used in the drm
> subsystem.
> I could see the following in intel_framebuffer_init(),
> (added in commit 2e2adb0573)
>
> << some code >>
> switch (mode_cmd->modifier[0]) {
> case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED_CCS:
> case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED_CCS:
> switch (mode_cmd->pixel_format) {
> case DRM_FORMAT_XBGR8888:
> case DRM_FORMAT_ABGR8888:
> case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888:
> case DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888:
> break;
> default:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("RC supported only with RGB8888 formats\n");
> goto err;
> }
> << some code >>
>
> And I see the following intel_primary_plane_format_mod_supported() -->
> skl_mod_supported()
> (added in commit 714244e280)
>
> << some code >>
> switch (format) {
> case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888:
> case DRM_FORMAT_XBGR8888:
> case DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888:
> case DRM_FORMAT_ABGR8888:
> if (modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED_CCS ||
> modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED_CCS)
> return true;
> << some code >>
>
> Is it a case of duplicacy? If we are checking for valid
> combination of formats and modifiers in intel_framebuffer_init(), then why do we
> need to check it again in skl_mod_supported()?
>
> Can we just check the valid combination only in
> skl_mod_supported() and not in intel_framebuffer_init() ?
The check in intel_framebuffer_init() is there to prevent the creation
of framebuffers that can't be scanned out by any plane. In theory we
don't have to do that, but I think it's a good idea in case userspace
just blindly probes which format+modifier combos are supported. And in
fact, before we got the IN_FORMATS property on planes blind probing
was the only way to discover the supported modifiers.
That said, I do want to eliminate that code from
intel_framebuffer_init() and replace it with a piece of generic code
that simply goes through all the planes and checks whether any of
them support the requested format+modifier combo. I've posted some
patches for that, but there were some unforseen complications due
to how some other drivers want to use modifiers. The last patch
I posted on the topic https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/211306/
should help us proceed but it didn't get reviewed so we're stuck
until I can nudge it forward somehow.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 10:55 Query about INTEL modifiers referred in intel_display.c Ayan Halder
2018-05-17 12:31 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180517123159.GG23723@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=ayan.halder@arm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox