Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] drm/i915: Use existing power well IDs where possible
Date: Mon,  6 Aug 2018 12:58:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180806095843.13294-10-imre.deak@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180806095843.13294-1-imre.deak@intel.com>

There is no need for separate IDs for power wells on a new platform with
the same functionality as an other power well on a previous platform, we
can just reuse the ID from the previous platform. This is only possible
after the previous patches where we removed dependence on the actual
enum values.

v2:
- Keep an ID assigned for the ICL PW#2 power well too. (Paulo)

Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         |  3 ---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 14 +++++++-------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index ef1fa5054e88..77b031874ee3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -1045,9 +1045,6 @@ enum i915_power_well_id {
 	SKL_DISP_PW_MISC_IO,
 	SKL_DISP_PW_1,
 	SKL_DISP_PW_2,
-	BXT_DPIO_CMN_BC,
-	ICL_DISP_PW_1,
-	ICL_DISP_PW_2,
 };
 
 #define PUNIT_REG_PWRGT_CTRL			0x60
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
index ae08f7824204..810695a71cc8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
@@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static void bxt_verify_ddi_phy_power_wells(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	if (power_well->count > 0)
 		bxt_ddi_phy_verify_state(dev_priv, power_well->desc->bxt.phy);
 
-	power_well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, BXT_DPIO_CMN_BC);
+	power_well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, VLV_DISP_PW_DPIO_CMN_BC);
 	if (power_well->count > 0)
 		bxt_ddi_phy_verify_state(dev_priv, power_well->desc->bxt.phy);
 
@@ -2457,7 +2457,7 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc bxt_power_wells[] = {
 		.name = "dpio-common-bc",
 		.domains = BXT_DPIO_CMN_BC_POWER_DOMAINS,
 		.ops = &bxt_dpio_cmn_power_well_ops,
-		.id = BXT_DPIO_CMN_BC,
+		.id = VLV_DISP_PW_DPIO_CMN_BC,
 		{
 			.bxt.phy = DPIO_PHY0,
 		},
@@ -2516,7 +2516,7 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc glk_power_wells[] = {
 		.name = "dpio-common-b",
 		.domains = GLK_DPIO_CMN_B_POWER_DOMAINS,
 		.ops = &bxt_dpio_cmn_power_well_ops,
-		.id = BXT_DPIO_CMN_BC,
+		.id = VLV_DISP_PW_DPIO_CMN_BC,
 		{
 			.bxt.phy = DPIO_PHY0,
 		},
@@ -2765,7 +2765,7 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc icl_power_wells[] = {
 		/* Handled by the DMC firmware */
 		.domains = 0,
 		.ops = &hsw_power_well_ops,
-		.id = ICL_DISP_PW_1,
+		.id = SKL_DISP_PW_1,
 		{
 			.hsw.regs = &hsw_power_well_regs,
 			.hsw.idx = ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_1,
@@ -2776,7 +2776,7 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc icl_power_wells[] = {
 		.name = "power well 2",
 		.domains = ICL_PW_2_POWER_DOMAINS,
 		.ops = &hsw_power_well_ops,
-		.id = ICL_DISP_PW_2,
+		.id = SKL_DISP_PW_2,
 		{
 			.hsw.regs = &hsw_power_well_regs,
 			.hsw.idx = ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_2,
@@ -3575,7 +3575,7 @@ static void icl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	 *    The AUX IO power wells will be enabled on demand.
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
-	well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, ICL_DISP_PW_1);
+	well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, SKL_DISP_PW_1);
 	intel_power_well_enable(dev_priv, well);
 	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
 
@@ -3612,7 +3612,7 @@ static void icl_display_core_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 *    disabled at this point.
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
-	well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, ICL_DISP_PW_1);
+	well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, SKL_DISP_PW_1);
 	intel_power_well_disable(dev_priv, well);
 	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
 
-- 
2.13.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-06  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-06  9:58 [PATCH v2 00/10] drm/i915: Clean up power well descriptors Imre Deak
2018-08-06  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] drm/i915/icl: Fix power well anonymous union initializers Imre Deak
2018-08-06  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] drm/i915: Rename intel_power_domains_fini() to intel_power_domains_fini_hw() Imre Deak
2018-08-06  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] drm/i915/vlv: Remove redundant power well ID asserts Imre Deak
2018-08-06  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] drm/i915: Constify power well descriptors Imre Deak
2018-08-06 22:52   ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-06  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915/vlv: Use power well CTL IDX instead of ID Imre Deak
2018-08-06  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915/ddi: " Imre Deak
2018-08-06  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915: Remove redundant power well IDs Imre Deak
2018-08-06 23:02   ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-06  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] drm/i915: Make power well ID names more uniform Imre Deak
2018-08-06  9:58 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2018-08-06 23:05   ` [PATCH v2 09/10] drm/i915: Use existing power well IDs where possible Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-06  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] drm/i915/icl: Add missing power gate enums Imre Deak
2018-08-06 10:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Clean up power well descriptors (rev2) Patchwork
2018-08-06 10:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-08-08 11:50 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] drm/i915: Clean up power well descriptors Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180806095843.13294-10-imre.deak@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox