From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Unset reset pch handshake when PCH is not present in one place
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:51:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180913215113.GL24668@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180913212251.22283-2-jose.souza@intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 02:22:49PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Right now RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE is enabled all the times inside
> of intel_power_domains_init_hw() and if PCH is NOP it is unsed in
> i915_gem_init_hw().
> So making skl_pch_reset_handshake() handle both cases and calling
> it for the missing gens in intel_power_domains_init_hw().
> Ivybridge have a different register and bits but with the same
> objective so moving it too.
>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 12 ------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 89834ce19acd..b389e084c8c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -5296,18 +5296,6 @@ int i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> I915_WRITE(MI_PREDICATE_RESULT_2, IS_HSW_GT3(dev_priv) ?
> LOWER_SLICE_ENABLED : LOWER_SLICE_DISABLED);
>
> - if (HAS_PCH_NOP(dev_priv)) {
> - if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv)) {
> - u32 temp = I915_READ(GEN7_MSG_CTL);
> - temp &= ~(WAIT_FOR_PCH_FLR_ACK | WAIT_FOR_PCH_RESET_ACK);
> - I915_WRITE(GEN7_MSG_CTL, temp);
> - } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7) {
> - u32 temp = I915_READ(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT);
> - temp &= ~RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE;
> - I915_WRITE(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT, temp);
> - }
> - }
> -
> intel_gt_workarounds_apply(dev_priv);
>
> i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 8bcb33367d0d..369a292cafac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -3239,11 +3239,12 @@ static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> I915_WRITE(MBUS_ABOX_CTL, val);
> }
>
> +/* Actually it is hsw+ but until skl it was not required to set it */
> static void skl_pch_reset_handshake(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> u32 val = I915_READ(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT);
>
> - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
> + if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv) && !HAS_PCH_NOP(dev_priv))
now I saw why you wanted the unset bit here as well ;)
> val |= RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE;
> else
> val &= ~RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE;
> @@ -3758,6 +3759,15 @@ void intel_power_domains_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool resume)
> mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
> vlv_cmnlane_wa(dev_priv);
> mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
> + } else if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv)) {
> + if (HAS_PCH_NOP(dev_priv)) {
> + u32 val = I915_READ(GEN7_MSG_CTL);
> +
> + val &= ~(WAIT_FOR_PCH_FLR_ACK | WAIT_FOR_PCH_RESET_ACK);
> + I915_WRITE(GEN7_MSG_CTL, val);
> + }
> + } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7) {
> + skl_pch_reset_handshake(dev_priv);
well... skl_ doesn't make sense anymore...
maybe s/skl/hsw ?
but what about the remaining block for Ivybridge?
I feel it got little unbalanced here...
maybe we move everything inside to a intel_pch_reset_handshake(dev_priv, bool set) ?
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.19.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-13 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-13 21:22 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Share code to enable/disable PCH reset handshake José Roberto de Souza
2018-09-13 21:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Unset reset pch handshake when PCH is not present in one place José Roberto de Souza
2018-09-13 21:51 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2018-09-14 0:46 ` Souza, Jose
2018-09-13 21:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Do not modifiy reserved bit in gens that do not have IPC José Roberto de Souza
2018-09-13 21:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-09-13 21:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Remove duplicated definition of intel_update_rawclk José Roberto de Souza
2018-09-13 21:47 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-09-13 21:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Share code to enable/disable PCH reset handshake Rodrigo Vivi
2018-09-13 22:30 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] " Patchwork
2018-09-14 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180913215113.GL24668@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox