From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/dp: Link train Fallback on eDP only if fallback link BW can fit panel's native mode
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 16:00:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181009130022.GF9144@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181008192331.GA15898@intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 12:23:32PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 07:03:52PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 03:57:16PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > > This patch fixes the original commit c0cfb10d9e1de49 ("drm/i915/edp:
> > > Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP") that causes
> > > a blank screen in case of certain eDP panels (Eg: seen on Dell XPS13 9350)
> > > where first link training fails and a retraining is required by falling
> > > back to lower link rate/lane count.
> > > In case of some panels they advertise higher link rate/lane count
> > > than whats required for supporting the panel's native mode.
> > > But we always link train at highest link rate/lane count for eDP
> > > and if that fails we can still fallback to lower link rate/lane count
> > > as long as the fallback link BW still fits the native mode to avoid
> > > pruning the panel's native mode yet retraining at fallback values
> > > to recover from a blank screen.
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > * Send uevent if link failure on eDP unconditionally
> > >
> > > Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107489
> > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105338
> > > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Alexander Wilson <alexander.wilson@ncf.edu>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 26 ++++++-----------
> > > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > index 436c22de33b6..e4de5257cd87 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -557,6 +557,21 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_params_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int link_rate,
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static bool intel_dp_can_link_train_fallback_for_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > + int link_rate,
> > > + uint8_t lane_count)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode = intel_dp->attached_connector->panel.fixed_mode;
> >
> > const
> >
>
> Will add const to the fixed_mode.
>
> > > + int mode_rate, max_rate;
> > > +
> > > + mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(fixed_mode->clock, 18);
> > > + max_rate = intel_dp_max_data_rate(link_rate, lane_count);
> > > + if (mode_rate > max_rate)
> > > + return false;
> >
> > I wonder if we should extract this into a helper and share with
> > mode_valid(). Then again, it's just a few lines so maybe not worth it.
> >
> > > +
> > > + return true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > int link_rate, uint8_t lane_count)
> > > {
> > > @@ -566,9 +581,23 @@ int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> > > link_rate);
> > > if (index > 0) {
> > > + if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> > > + !intel_dp_can_link_train_fallback_for_edp(intel_dp,
> > > + intel_dp->common_rates[index - 1],
> > > + lane_count)) {
> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Retrying Link training for eDP with same parameters\n");
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > intel_dp->max_link_rate = intel_dp->common_rates[index - 1];
> > > intel_dp->max_link_lane_count = lane_count;
> > > } else if (lane_count > 1) {
> > > + if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> > > + !intel_dp_can_link_train_fallback_for_edp(intel_dp,
> > > + intel_dp_max_common_rate(intel_dp),
> > > + lane_count >> 1)) {
> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Retrying Link training for eDP with same parameters\n");
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > intel_dp->max_link_rate = intel_dp_max_common_rate(intel_dp);
> > > intel_dp->max_link_lane_count = lane_count >> 1;
> >
> > This whole thing is getting a bit messy. I think it would worthwile to
> > rewrite this as something like:
> >
> > intel_dp_update_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp)
> > {
> > int link_rate = intel_dp->link_rate;
> > int lane_count = intel_dp->lane_count;
> >
> > if (intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp, &link_rate, &lane_count))
> > return -1;
> >
> > if (is_edp() && !edp_can_link_train_thing(link_rate, lane_count)) {
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("...");
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > intel_dp->max_link_rate = link_rate;
> > intel_dp->max_link_lane_count = lane_count;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > But that can be done later. With the missing const added this patch is
> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
>
> Yes this can be refactored/reorganized as a follow up patch, also when downclock mode
> checks get in.
> So until then thsi fix is good to be merged right?
Yes.
>
> Manasi
>
> > > } else {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > > index a9f40985a621..30be0e39bd5f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > > @@ -367,22 +367,14 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > failure_handling:
> > > - /* Dont fallback and prune modes if its eDP */
> > > - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> > > - intel_connector->base.base.id,
> > > - intel_connector->base.name,
> > > - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > > - if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> > > - intel_dp->link_rate,
> > > - intel_dp->lane_count))
> > > - /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> > > - schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
> > > - } else {
> > > - DRM_ERROR("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> > > - intel_connector->base.base.id,
> > > - intel_connector->base.name,
> > > - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > > - }
> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> > > + intel_connector->base.base.id,
> > > + intel_connector->base.name,
> > > + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > > + if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> > > + intel_dp->link_rate,
> > > + intel_dp->lane_count))
> > > + /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> > > + schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.18.0
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-09 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-12 22:57 [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/dp: Link train Fallback on eDP only if fallback link BW can fit panel's native mode Manasi Navare
2018-09-12 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/dp: Disconnect eDP downclock mode from DRRS Manasi Navare
2018-09-12 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/dp: Validate the downclock mode for eDP if it exists Manasi Navare
2018-10-01 16:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-09-12 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/dp: Check eDP fallback link BW against downclock mode Manasi Navare
2018-09-12 23:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/dp: Link train Fallback on eDP only if fallback link BW can fit panel's native mode Patchwork
2018-09-13 0:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] " Lucas De Marchi
2018-10-09 20:49 ` Manasi Navare
2018-09-13 4:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v2,1/4] " Patchwork
2018-10-01 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] " Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-08 19:23 ` Manasi Navare
2018-10-09 13:00 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181009130022.GF9144@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox