From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 18/42] drm/i915/lmem: support CPU relocations
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:57:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214145740.14521-19-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214145740.14521-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>
We need to support doing relocations from the CPU when dealing with LMEM
objects.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 02adcaf6ebea..390691128c1d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ struct i915_execbuffer {
bool has_llc : 1;
bool has_fence : 1;
bool needs_unfenced : 1;
+ bool is_lmem : 1;
struct i915_request *rq;
u32 *rq_cmd;
@@ -973,6 +974,7 @@ static void reloc_cache_init(struct reloc_cache *cache,
cache->use_64bit_reloc = HAS_64BIT_RELOC(i915);
cache->has_fence = cache->gen < 4;
cache->needs_unfenced = INTEL_INFO(i915)->unfenced_needs_alignment;
+ cache->is_lmem = false;
cache->node.allocated = false;
cache->rq = NULL;
cache->rq_size = 0;
@@ -1027,16 +1029,23 @@ static void reloc_cache_reset(struct reloc_cache *cache)
i915_gem_obj_finish_shmem_access((struct drm_i915_gem_object *)cache->node.mm);
} else {
wmb();
- io_mapping_unmap_atomic((void __iomem *)vaddr);
- if (cache->node.allocated) {
- struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = cache_to_ggtt(cache);
-
- ggtt->vm.clear_range(&ggtt->vm,
- cache->node.start,
- cache->node.size);
- drm_mm_remove_node(&cache->node);
+
+ if (cache->is_lmem) {
+ io_mapping_unmap_atomic((void __iomem *)vaddr);
+ i915_gem_object_unpin_pages((struct drm_i915_gem_object *)cache->node.mm);
+ cache->is_lmem = false;
} else {
- i915_vma_unpin((struct i915_vma *)cache->node.mm);
+ io_mapping_unmap_atomic((void __iomem *)vaddr);
+ if (cache->node.allocated) {
+ struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = cache_to_ggtt(cache);
+
+ ggtt->vm.clear_range(&ggtt->vm,
+ cache->node.start,
+ cache->node.size);
+ drm_mm_remove_node(&cache->node);
+ } else {
+ i915_vma_unpin((struct i915_vma *)cache->node.mm);
+ }
}
}
@@ -1076,6 +1085,38 @@ static void *reloc_kmap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
return vaddr;
}
+static void *reloc_lmem(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+ struct reloc_cache *cache,
+ unsigned long page)
+{
+ void *vaddr;
+ int err;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(use_cpu_reloc(cache, obj));
+
+ if (cache->vaddr) {
+ io_mapping_unmap_atomic((void __force __iomem *) unmask_page(cache->vaddr));
+ } else {
+ err = i915_gem_object_set_to_wc_domain(obj, true);
+ if (err)
+ return ERR_PTR(err);
+
+ err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+ if (err)
+ return ERR_PTR(err);
+
+ cache->node.mm = (void *)obj;
+ cache->is_lmem = true;
+ }
+
+ vaddr = i915_gem_object_lmem_io_map_page(obj, page);
+
+ cache->vaddr = (unsigned long)vaddr;
+ cache->page = page;
+
+ return vaddr;
+}
+
static void *reloc_iomap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct reloc_cache *cache,
unsigned long page)
@@ -1150,8 +1191,12 @@ static void *reloc_vaddr(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
vaddr = unmask_page(cache->vaddr);
} else {
vaddr = NULL;
- if ((cache->vaddr & KMAP) == 0)
- vaddr = reloc_iomap(obj, cache, page);
+ if ((cache->vaddr & KMAP) == 0) {
+ if (i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj))
+ vaddr = reloc_lmem(obj, cache, page);
+ else
+ vaddr = reloc_iomap(obj, cache, page);
+ }
if (!vaddr)
vaddr = reloc_kmap(obj, cache, page);
}
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-14 14:56 [RFC PATCH 00/42] Introduce memory region concept (including device local memory) Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 01/42] drm/i915: support 1G pages for the 48b PPGTT Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 02/42] drm/i915: enable platform support for 1G pages Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 03/42] drm/i915: buddy allocator Matthew Auld
2019-02-15 12:34 ` Jani Nikula
2019-02-15 15:03 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-18 11:35 ` Jani Nikula
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 04/42] drm/i915: introduce intel_memory_region Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 15:16 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 14:03 ` Matthew Auld
2019-02-26 14:18 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 13:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 14:20 ` Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 05/42] drm/i915/region: support basic eviction Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 15:25 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 14:58 ` Matthew Auld
2019-02-26 16:49 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 06/42] drm/i915/region: support continuous allocations Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 07/42] drm/i915/region: support volatile objects Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 08/42] drm/i915: Add memory region information to device_info Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 09/42] drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 15:30 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 10/42] drm/i915/lmem: add helper to get CPU visible pfn Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 15:33 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 11/42] drm/i915/selftests: exercise writes to LMEM Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 12/42] drm/i915/selftests: exercise huge-pages for LMEM Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 13/42] drm/i915: support object clearing via blitter engine Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 15:37 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 15:38 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 15:40 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 14/42] drm/i915: introduce kernel blitter_context Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 15:42 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 15/42] drm/i915: support copying objects via blitter engine Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 16/42] drm/i915: support basic object migration Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 17/42] drm/i915/lmem: support kernel mapping Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2019-02-14 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH 18/42] drm/i915/lmem: support CPU relocations Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 18:53 ` Matthew Auld
2019-02-26 18:58 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 19/42] drm/i915: add vfunc for pread Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 20/42] drm/i915/lmem: support pread Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 15:50 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 21/42] drm/i915/lmem: support pwrite Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 22/42] drm/i915: define HAS_MAPPABLE_APERTURE Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 23/42] drm/i915: do not map aperture if it is not available Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 24/42] drm/i915: expose missing map_gtt support to users Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 25/42] drm/i915: set num_fence_regs to 0 if there is no aperture Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 26/42] drm/i915: error capture with no ggtt slot Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 15:56 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 27/42] drm/i915: Don't try to place HWS in non-existing mappable region Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 28/42] drm/i915: Split out GTT fault handler to make it generic Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 16:00 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 29/42] drm/i915: Set correct vmf source pages for gem objects Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 16:02 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 30/42] drm/i915: Introduce DRM_I915_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 16:05 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 13:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 13:37 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 31/42] drm/i915: cpu-map based dumb buffers Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 16:06 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 32/42] drm/i915: Add fill_pages handler for dma_buf imported objects Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 33/42] UPSTREAM: drm/i915/query: Split out query item checks Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 34/42] drm/i915/query: Expose memory regions through the query uAPI Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 16:31 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 16:33 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 21:12 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 21:15 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 21:21 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-20 18:56 ` Jason Ekstrand
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 35/42] drm/i915: Introduce GEM_OBJECT_SETPARAM with I915_PARAM_MEMORY_REGION Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 16:20 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 36/42] drm/i915/lmem: include debugfs metrics Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 37/42] drm/i915: enumerate and init each supported region Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 38/42] drm/i915: treat shmem as a region Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 39/42] drm/i915: treat stolen " Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 40/42] drm/i915: setup io-mapping for LMEM Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 41/42] HAX drm/i915: add the fake lmem region Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 42/42] HAX drm/i915/lmem: default userspace allocations to LMEM Matthew Auld
2019-02-14 16:13 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-18 12:44 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-19 17:44 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 16:22 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-14 17:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce memory region concept (including device local memory) Patchwork
2019-02-14 18:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-02-15 0:47 ` [RFC PATCH 00/42] " Dave Airlie
2019-02-19 13:32 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-02-25 20:24 ` Dave Airlie
2019-02-26 2:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2019-02-26 5:31 ` Alex Deucher
2019-02-26 10:41 ` Jani Nikula
2019-02-26 12:17 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-02-26 17:20 ` Alex Deucher
2019-02-26 18:52 ` Christian König
2019-02-26 19:14 ` Alex Deucher
2019-02-26 23:04 ` Dave Airlie
2019-02-27 12:17 ` Christian König
2019-02-27 14:40 ` Joonas Lahtinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190214145740.14521-19-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox