intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Prevent incorrect DBuf enabling
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:59:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307175939.GG30283@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190307103235.23538-1-imre.deak@intel.com>

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:32:35PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Pretend that we have only 1 DBuf slice and that 1 slice is always
> enabled, until we have a proper way for on-demand toggling of the second
> slice.  Currently we'll try to incorrectly enable DBuf even when all
> pipes are disabled and we are already runtime suspended (as the computed
> number of DBuf slices will be 1 in that case).
> 
> This also means we'll leave the second slice enabled redundantly (except
> when suspended), but that's an acceptable tradeoff until we have a
> proper solution.

redundant is the word of the week :)

> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108756
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c         |  7 ++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 9c97a95c1816..bece16ae6d15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3624,7 +3624,12 @@ static u8 intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11)
>  		return enabled_slices;
>  
> -	if (I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S2) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)
> +	/*
> +	 * FIXME: for now we'll only ever use 1 slice; pretend that we have
> +	 * only that 1 slice enabled until we have a proper way for on-demand
> +	 * toggling of the second slice.
> +	 */
> +	if (0 && I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S2) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)

what if just add a check for enabled_slices >= 2 and avoid the FIXME here?

but up to you:

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

>  		enabled_slices++;
>  
>  	return enabled_slices;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index aa974b11928a..676a89bb8194 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -3576,7 +3576,11 @@ static void icl_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	    !(I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S2) & DBUF_POWER_STATE))
>  		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n");
>  	else
> -		dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = 2;
> +		/*
> +		 * FIXME: for now pretend that we only have 1 slice, see
> +		 * intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num().
> +		 */
> +		dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = 1;
>  }
>  
>  static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -3591,7 +3595,11 @@ static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	    (I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S2) & DBUF_POWER_STATE))
>  		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power disable timeout!\n");
>  	else
> -		dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = 0;
> +		/*
> +		 * FIXME: for now pretend that the first slice is always
> +		 * enabled, see intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num().
> +		 */
> +		dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = 1;
>  }
>  
>  static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -- 
> 2.13.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-07 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-07 10:32 [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Prevent incorrect DBuf enabling Imre Deak
2019-03-07 15:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/icl: Prevent incorrect DBuf enabling (rev2) Patchwork
2019-03-07 15:52   ` Imre Deak
2019-03-08  8:16     ` Imre Deak
2019-03-07 17:59 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2019-03-07 19:45   ` [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Prevent incorrect DBuf enabling Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190307175939.GG30283@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).