From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/icl: use a function pointer for pll_write when enabling
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 22:19:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190308201954.GW3888@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190306012636.18619-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 05:26:33PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> This allows us to share the icl_pll_enable() between the different types
> of PLL while allowing the caller to differentiate how to write the
> registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 3b3de99756d6..5511bc23ea3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -3118,9 +3118,10 @@ static void icl_mg_pll_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> static void icl_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
> - i915_reg_t enable_reg)
> + i915_reg_t enable_reg,
> + void (*pll_write)(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll))
> {
> - const enum intel_dpll_id id = pll->info->id;
> u32 val;
>
> val = I915_READ(enable_reg);
> @@ -3133,12 +3134,9 @@ static void icl_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> */
> if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, enable_reg, PLL_POWER_STATE,
> PLL_POWER_STATE, 1))
> - DRM_ERROR("PLL %d Power not enabled\n", id);
> + DRM_ERROR("PLL %d Power not enabled\n", pll->info->id);
>
> - if (intel_dpll_is_combophy(id) || id == DPLL_ID_ICL_TBTPLL)
> - icl_dpll_write(dev_priv, pll);
> - else
> - icl_mg_pll_write(dev_priv, pll);
> + pll_write(dev_priv, pll);
Hmm. Would it be cleaner to just exract the pll power
enable/disable and pll enable/disable parts into small helpers?
It looks like like glk/cnl also follow this same pattern, so
there may be a chance to reuse the code on those platforms
as well.
>
> /*
> * DVFS pre sequence would be here, but in our driver the cdclk code
> @@ -3152,7 +3150,7 @@ static void icl_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, enable_reg, PLL_LOCK, PLL_LOCK,
> 1)) /* 600us actually. */
> - DRM_ERROR("PLL %d not locked\n", id);
> + DRM_ERROR("PLL %d not locked\n", pll->info->id);
>
> /* DVFS post sequence would be here. See the comment above. */
> }
> @@ -3162,7 +3160,7 @@ static void combo_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> {
> i915_reg_t enable_reg = icl_pll_id_to_enable_reg(pll->info->id);
>
> - icl_pll_enable(dev_priv, pll, enable_reg);
> + icl_pll_enable(dev_priv, pll, enable_reg, icl_dpll_write);
> }
>
> static void mg_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -3171,7 +3169,7 @@ static void mg_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> i915_reg_t enable_reg =
> MG_PLL_ENABLE(icl_pll_id_to_tc_port(pll->info->id));
>
> - icl_pll_enable(dev_priv, pll, enable_reg);
> + icl_pll_enable(dev_priv, pll, enable_reg, icl_mg_pll_write);
> }
>
> static void icl_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> --
> 2.20.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-08 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-06 1:26 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/icl: split pll functions Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-06 1:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/icl: split combo and mg pll enable Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-06 1:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/icl: use a function pointer for pll_write when enabling Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-08 20:19 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-03-06 1:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/icl: split combo and mg pll disable Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-06 1:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/icl: split combo and tbt pll funcs Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-06 1:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/icl: remove intel_dpll_is_combophy() Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-06 1:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/icl: split pll functions Patchwork
2019-03-06 9:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190308201954.GW3888@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox