From: Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>
To: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor to expand subslice mask (rev5)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 23:13:16 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430231316.26875.28954@emeril.freedesktop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430230606.8421-1-stuart.summers@intel.com>
== Series Details ==
Series: Refactor to expand subslice mask (rev5)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/59742/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
2699899bf520 drm/i915: Use local variable for SSEU info in GETPARAM ioctl
5c73378a02c2 drm/i915: Add macro for SSEU stride calculation
1aa1a9b832aa drm/i915: Move calculation of subslices per slice to new function
f03d45e541ca drm/i915: Move sseu helper functions to intel_sseu.h
2b9349156f64 drm/i915: Remove inline from sseu helper functions
9b09ab1e44a3 drm/i915: Expand subslice mask
-:84: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'sseu__' - possible side-effects?
#84: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h:542:
+#define instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv__, sseu__, slice__, subslice__) \
+ ((IS_GEN(dev_priv__, 7) ? \
+ 1 : (sseu__)->subslice_mask[slice__ * (sseu__)->ss_stride + \
+ subslice__ / BITS_PER_BYTE]) & \
+ BIT(subslice__ % BITS_PER_BYTE)) \
+
-:84: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'slice__' may be better as '(slice__)' to avoid precedence issues
#84: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h:542:
+#define instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv__, sseu__, slice__, subslice__) \
+ ((IS_GEN(dev_priv__, 7) ? \
+ 1 : (sseu__)->subslice_mask[slice__ * (sseu__)->ss_stride + \
+ subslice__ / BITS_PER_BYTE]) & \
+ BIT(subslice__ % BITS_PER_BYTE)) \
+
-:84: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'subslice__' - possible side-effects?
#84: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h:542:
+#define instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv__, sseu__, slice__, subslice__) \
+ ((IS_GEN(dev_priv__, 7) ? \
+ 1 : (sseu__)->subslice_mask[slice__ * (sseu__)->ss_stride + \
+ subslice__ / BITS_PER_BYTE]) & \
+ BIT(subslice__ % BITS_PER_BYTE)) \
+
-:84: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'subslice__' may be better as '(subslice__)' to avoid precedence issues
#84: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h:542:
+#define instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv__, sseu__, slice__, subslice__) \
+ ((IS_GEN(dev_priv__, 7) ? \
+ 1 : (sseu__)->subslice_mask[slice__ * (sseu__)->ss_stride + \
+ subslice__ / BITS_PER_BYTE]) & \
+ BIT(subslice__ % BITS_PER_BYTE)) \
+
-:90: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'dev_priv_' - possible side-effects?
#90: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h:548:
+#define for_each_instdone_slice_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_) \
+ for ((slice_) = 0, (subslice_) = 0; (slice_) < I915_MAX_SLICES; \
+ (subslice_) = ((subslice_) + 1) < I915_MAX_SUBSLICES ? (subslice_) + 1 : 0, \
+ (slice_) += ((subslice_) == 0)) \
+ for_each_if(instdone_has_slice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice) && \
+ instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_)) \
-:90: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'sseu_' - possible side-effects?
#90: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h:548:
+#define for_each_instdone_slice_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_) \
+ for ((slice_) = 0, (subslice_) = 0; (slice_) < I915_MAX_SLICES; \
+ (subslice_) = ((subslice_) + 1) < I915_MAX_SUBSLICES ? (subslice_) + 1 : 0, \
+ (slice_) += ((subslice_) == 0)) \
+ for_each_if(instdone_has_slice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice) && \
+ instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_)) \
-:90: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'slice_' - possible side-effects?
#90: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h:548:
+#define for_each_instdone_slice_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_) \
+ for ((slice_) = 0, (subslice_) = 0; (slice_) < I915_MAX_SLICES; \
+ (subslice_) = ((subslice_) + 1) < I915_MAX_SUBSLICES ? (subslice_) + 1 : 0, \
+ (slice_) += ((subslice_) == 0)) \
+ for_each_if(instdone_has_slice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice) && \
+ instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_)) \
-:90: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'subslice_' - possible side-effects?
#90: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h:548:
+#define for_each_instdone_slice_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_) \
+ for ((slice_) = 0, (subslice_) = 0; (slice_) < I915_MAX_SLICES; \
+ (subslice_) = ((subslice_) + 1) < I915_MAX_SUBSLICES ? (subslice_) + 1 : 0, \
+ (slice_) += ((subslice_) == 0)) \
+ for_each_if(instdone_has_slice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice) && \
+ instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_)) \
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 8 checks, 692 lines checked
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 23:06 [PATCH 0/6] Refactor to expand subslice mask Stuart Summers
2019-04-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Use local variable for SSEU info in GETPARAM ioctl Stuart Summers
2019-05-01 0:44 ` Stuart Summers
2019-04-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Add macro for SSEU stride calculation Stuart Summers
2019-04-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Move calculation of subslices per slice to new function Stuart Summers
2019-04-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Move sseu helper functions to intel_sseu.h Stuart Summers
2019-04-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Remove inline from sseu helper functions Stuart Summers
2019-04-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Expand subslice mask Stuart Summers
2019-04-30 23:13 ` Patchwork [this message]
2019-04-30 23:16 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Refactor to expand subslice mask (rev5) Patchwork
2019-05-01 0:00 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-05-01 0:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Refactor to expand subslice mask (rev6) Patchwork
2019-05-01 15:36 ` Summers, Stuart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190430231316.26875.28954@emeril.freedesktop.org \
--to=patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox