public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 16:30:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190516133031.GN24299@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a7fma79e.fsf@intel.com>

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:55:25PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2019, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Op 16-05-2019 om 07:58 schreef Harish Chegondi:
> >> display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and the
> >> second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT which
> >> is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
> >>
> >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
> >> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >> index 233211fde0ea..3809e9f7fae2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >> @@ -1775,11 +1775,11 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>  	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
> >>  	 * out the buggy result.
> >>  	 *
> >> -	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
> >> +	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
> >>  	 * don't trust that one either.
> >>  	 */
> >>  	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
> >> -	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
> >> +	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
> >>  		pipe_crc->skipped++;
> >>  		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
> >>  		return;
> >
> > I would be interested in the results, haswell is different from
> > VLV. Has it ever been observed on that platform?
> 
> Good point. I looked at [1] which I presumed was on VLV, but it says
> nothing about HSW.

This whole thing is just a pile of duct tape anyway. The reason(s)
for these funky crcs has never been properly analysed.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-16 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-16  5:58 [PATCH 0/1] Reg: igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@* CRC mismatch test failures Harish Chegondi
2019-05-16  5:58 ` [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs Harish Chegondi
2019-05-16  8:30   ` Jani Nikula
2019-05-16 12:46   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-05-16 12:55     ` Jani Nikula
2019-05-16 13:30       ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-05-16 15:46         ` Jani Nikula
2019-05-16 21:02         ` Chegondi, Harish
2019-05-16 20:52       ` Chegondi, Harish
2019-10-23  7:24   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Invalid CRCs causing CRC mismatch test failures Harish Chegondi
2019-10-23  7:24     ` [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs Harish Chegondi
2019-10-23 22:15       ` Chegondi, Harish
2019-10-23 22:15         ` [Intel-gfx] " Chegondi, Harish
2019-10-23  8:08     ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/1] " Patchwork
2019-05-16  6:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Reg: igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@* CRC mismatch test failures Patchwork
2019-05-16  7:51 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190516133031.GN24299@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox