From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/dmc: extract fw_info and table walk from intel_package_header
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 02:12:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190607091230.1489-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190607091230.1489-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Move fw_info out of struct intel_package_header to allow it to grow more
easily in future. To make a cleaner move, let's also extract a function to
search the header for the dmc_offset.
While reviewing this code I wondered why we continued the search even
after finding a suitable firmware. Add a comment to explain we will
continue to try to find a more specific firmware version, even if this
is not required by the spec.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
index 3d2beecd8d0d..99fa4db95e46 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ MODULE_FIRMWARE(SKL_CSR_PATH);
MODULE_FIRMWARE(BXT_CSR_PATH);
#define CSR_DEFAULT_FW_OFFSET 0xFFFFFFFF
+#define PACKAGE_MAX_FW_INFO_ENTRIES 20
struct intel_css_header {
/* 0x09 for DMC */
@@ -139,8 +140,6 @@ struct intel_package_header {
/* Number of valid entries in the FWInfo array below */
u32 num_entries;
-
- struct intel_fw_info fw_info[20];
} __packed;
struct intel_dmc_header {
@@ -292,6 +291,46 @@ void intel_csr_load_program(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(dev_priv);
}
+/*
+ * Search fw_info table for dmc_offset to find firmware binary: num_entries is
+ * already sanitized.
+ */
+static u32 find_dmc_fw_offset(const struct intel_fw_info *fw_info,
+ unsigned int num_entries,
+ const struct stepping_info *si)
+{
+ u32 dmc_offset = CSR_DEFAULT_FW_OFFSET;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
+ if (fw_info[i].substepping == '*' &&
+ si->stepping == fw_info[i].stepping) {
+ dmc_offset = fw_info[i].offset;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (si->stepping == fw_info[i].stepping &&
+ si->substepping == fw_info[i].substepping) {
+ dmc_offset = fw_info[i].offset;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (fw_info[i].stepping == '*' &&
+ fw_info[i].substepping == '*') {
+ /*
+ * In theory we should stop the search as generic
+ * entries should always come after the more specific
+ * ones, but let's continue to make sure to work even
+ * with "broken" firmwares. If we don't find a more
+ * specific one, then we use this entry
+ */
+ dmc_offset = fw_info[i].offset;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return dmc_offset;
+}
+
static u32 *parse_csr_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
const struct firmware *fw)
{
@@ -300,7 +339,7 @@ static u32 *parse_csr_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
struct intel_dmc_header *dmc_header;
struct intel_csr *csr = &dev_priv->csr;
const struct stepping_info *si = intel_get_stepping_info(dev_priv);
- u32 dmc_offset = CSR_DEFAULT_FW_OFFSET, readcount = 0, nbytes;
+ u32 dmc_offset, num_entries, readcount = 0, nbytes;
u32 i;
u32 *dmc_payload;
size_t fsize;
@@ -349,27 +388,26 @@ static u32 *parse_csr_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
(package_header->header_len * 4));
return NULL;
}
+
readcount += sizeof(struct intel_package_header);
+ num_entries = package_header->num_entries;
+ if (WARN_ON(package_header->num_entries > PACKAGE_MAX_FW_INFO_ENTRIES))
+ num_entries = PACKAGE_MAX_FW_INFO_ENTRIES;
- /* Search for dmc_offset to find firware binary. */
- for (i = 0; i < package_header->num_entries; i++) {
- if (package_header->fw_info[i].substepping == '*' &&
- si->stepping == package_header->fw_info[i].stepping) {
- dmc_offset = package_header->fw_info[i].offset;
- break;
- } else if (si->stepping == package_header->fw_info[i].stepping &&
- si->substepping == package_header->fw_info[i].substepping) {
- dmc_offset = package_header->fw_info[i].offset;
- break;
- } else if (package_header->fw_info[i].stepping == '*' &&
- package_header->fw_info[i].substepping == '*')
- dmc_offset = package_header->fw_info[i].offset;
- }
+ fsize += PACKAGE_MAX_FW_INFO_ENTRIES * sizeof(struct intel_fw_info);
+ if (fsize > fw->size)
+ goto error_truncated;
+
+ dmc_offset = find_dmc_fw_offset((struct intel_fw_info *)
+ &fw->data[readcount], num_entries, si);
if (dmc_offset == CSR_DEFAULT_FW_OFFSET) {
DRM_ERROR("DMC firmware not supported for %c stepping\n",
si->stepping);
return NULL;
}
+ /* we always have space for PACKAGE_MAX_FW_INFO_ENTRIES */
+ readcount += PACKAGE_MAX_FW_INFO_ENTRIES * sizeof(struct intel_fw_info);
+
/* Convert dmc_offset into number of bytes. By default it is in dwords*/
dmc_offset *= 4;
readcount += dmc_offset;
--
2.21.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-07 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-07 9:12 [PATCH 0/9] Add support for new DMC headers Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-07 9:12 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/dmc: use kernel types Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-07 9:12 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2019-06-10 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/dmc: extract fw_info and table walk from intel_package_header Srivatsa, Anusha
2019-06-07 9:12 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/dmc: add support for package_header with version 2 Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-10 18:22 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2019-06-07 9:12 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dmc: extract function to parse css header Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-14 19:30 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2019-06-07 9:12 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dmc: extract function to parse package_header Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-14 20:09 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2019-06-07 9:12 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dmc: extract function to parse dmc_header Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-14 20:24 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2019-06-07 9:12 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/dmc: add support to load dmc_header version 3 Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-14 20:03 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2019-06-07 9:12 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dmc: remove redundant return in parse_csr_fw() Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-14 19:51 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2019-06-07 9:12 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/dmc: protect against loading wrong firmware Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-14 19:44 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2019-06-14 21:37 ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-17 17:46 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2019-06-07 10:40 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Add support for new DMC headers Patchwork
2019-06-09 17:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190607091230.1489-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox