public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
To: Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Implement read-only support in whitelist selftest
Date: Tue,  2 Jul 2019 19:06:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190703020604.20369-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190703020604.20369-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>

From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>

Newer hardware supports extra feature in the whitelist registers. This
patch updates the selftest to test that entries marked as read only
are actually read only.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c    | 43 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
index f8151d5946c8..5cd2b17105ba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
@@ -482,12 +482,12 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
 		u32 srm, lrm, rsvd;
 		u32 expect;
 		int idx;
+		bool ro_reg;
 
 		if (wo_register(engine, reg))
 			continue;
 
-		if (ro_register(reg))
-			continue;
+		ro_reg = ro_register(reg);
 
 		srm = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM;
 		lrm = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM;
@@ -588,24 +588,37 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
 		}
 
 		GEM_BUG_ON(values[ARRAY_SIZE(values) - 1] != 0xffffffff);
-		rsvd = results[ARRAY_SIZE(values)]; /* detect write masking */
-		if (!rsvd) {
-			pr_err("%s: Unable to write to whitelisted register %x\n",
-			       engine->name, reg);
-			err = -EINVAL;
-			goto out_unpin;
+		if (ro_reg) {
+			rsvd = 0xFFFFFFFF;
+		} else {
+			/* detect write masking */
+			rsvd = results[ARRAY_SIZE(values)];
+			if (!rsvd) {
+				pr_err("%s: Unable to write to whitelisted register %x\n",
+				       engine->name, reg);
+				err = -EINVAL;
+				goto out_unpin;
+			}
 		}
 
 		expect = results[0];
 		idx = 1;
 		for (v = 0; v < ARRAY_SIZE(values); v++) {
-			expect = reg_write(expect, values[v], rsvd);
+			if (ro_reg)
+				expect = results[0];
+			else
+				expect = reg_write(expect, values[v], rsvd);
+
 			if (results[idx] != expect)
 				err++;
 			idx++;
 		}
 		for (v = 0; v < ARRAY_SIZE(values); v++) {
-			expect = reg_write(expect, ~values[v], rsvd);
+			if (ro_reg)
+				expect = results[0];
+			else
+				expect = reg_write(expect, ~values[v], rsvd);
+
 			if (results[idx] != expect)
 				err++;
 			idx++;
@@ -622,7 +635,10 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
 			for (v = 0; v < ARRAY_SIZE(values); v++) {
 				u32 w = values[v];
 
-				expect = reg_write(expect, w, rsvd);
+				if (ro_reg)
+					expect = results[0];
+				else
+					expect = reg_write(expect, w, rsvd);
 				pr_info("Wrote %08x, read %08x, expect %08x\n",
 					w, results[idx], expect);
 				idx++;
@@ -630,7 +646,10 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
 			for (v = 0; v < ARRAY_SIZE(values); v++) {
 				u32 w = ~values[v];
 
-				expect = reg_write(expect, w, rsvd);
+				if (ro_reg)
+					expect = results[0];
+				else
+					expect = reg_write(expect, w, rsvd);
 				pr_info("Wrote %08x, read %08x, expect %08x\n",
 					w, results[idx], expect);
 				idx++;
-- 
2.21.0.5.gaeb582a983

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-03  2:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-03  2:06 [PATCH 0/2] Improve whitelist selftest for read-only registers John.C.Harrison
2019-07-03  2:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Add test for invalid flag bits in whitelist entries John.C.Harrison
2019-07-03 13:50   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-07-03  2:06 ` John.C.Harrison [this message]
2019-07-03  8:32   ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Implement read-only support in whitelist selftest Chris Wilson
2019-07-03 19:43     ` John Harrison
2019-07-10  8:21       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-07-04 10:10   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-07-03  2:43 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Improve whitelist selftest for read-only registers Patchwork
2019-07-03  7:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add engine name to workaround debug print John.C.Harrison
2019-07-03 13:53   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-07-03  9:36 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Improve whitelist selftest for read-only registers Patchwork
2019-07-03 23:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-07-04  2:31 ` Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190703020604.20369-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox