From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: fix include order in intel_tc.*
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 16:56:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190704135641.GD25657@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190704000649.20661-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 05:06:47PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Make intel_tc.h the first include so we guarantee it's self-contained.
> Sort the rest. Same principle applies for includes in the header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> index 1a9dd32fb0a5..e6e6163c1232 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> @@ -3,10 +3,11 @@
> * Copyright © 2019 Intel Corporation
> */
>
> +#include "intel_tc.h"
I get your point to keep the self-contained check work even without the
header test files, but I'm not sure if we need that, since there is the
header test file approach in place. I haven't seen this done anywhere
else, so we shouldn't make an exception here either imo.
+Jani for that.
Fixing the rest of my ABC screw-up looks ok.
> +
> +#include "i915_drv.h"
> #include "intel_display.h"
> #include "intel_dp_mst.h"
> -#include "i915_drv.h"
> -#include "intel_tc.h"
>
> static const char *tc_port_mode_name(enum tc_port_mode mode)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> index 0d8411d4a91d..45ae30537b78 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> @@ -6,10 +6,11 @@
> #ifndef __INTEL_TC_H__
> #define __INTEL_TC_H__
>
> -#include <linux/types.h>
> -#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include "intel_drv.h"
>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> bool intel_tc_port_connected(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> u32 intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> --
> 2.21.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-04 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-04 0:06 [PATCH 0/4] Modular FIA Lucas De Marchi
2019-07-04 0:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: make new intel_tc.c use uncore accessors Lucas De Marchi
2019-07-04 0:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: fix include order in intel_tc.* Lucas De Marchi
2019-07-04 13:56 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2019-07-08 15:13 ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-08-05 9:16 ` Jani Nikula
2019-07-04 17:21 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2019-07-04 17:43 ` Imre Deak
2019-07-04 17:56 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2019-07-04 18:53 ` Imre Deak
2019-07-08 15:16 ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-07-04 0:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: move intel_ddi_set_fia_lane_count to intel_tc.c Lucas De Marchi
2019-07-04 14:03 ` Imre Deak
2019-07-04 0:06 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Add modular FIA Lucas De Marchi
2019-07-04 1:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Modular FIA Patchwork
2019-07-04 1:39 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-07-05 4:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-07-03 23:59 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: make new intel_tc.c use uncore accessors Lucas De Marchi
2019-07-03 23:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: fix include order in intel_tc.* Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190704135641.GD25657@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox