From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gen11: Add Wa_1604278689:icl,ehl
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:29:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190816162909.GG832@mdroper-desk.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156593923813.16357.16740821954518873452@skylake-alporthouse-com>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 08:07:18AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Patchwork (2019-08-16 00:52:20)
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> >
> > * igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck:
> > - fi-icl-u3: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
> > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6714/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
> > [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14040/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
> > - {fi-icl-dsi}: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4]
> > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6714/fi-icl-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
> > [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14040/fi-icl-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
> > - {fi-icl-u4}: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6]
> > [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6714/fi-icl-u4/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
> > [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14040/fi-icl-u4/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
>
> All icl machines suffering a similar failure to reset an engine (not
> rcs!). We haven't seen that before, so it does look very suspicious.
> -Chris
Hmm. So for a render engine register that's saved/restored as part of
the context, is there somewhere else I should be setting this value? My
understanding was that the items added in *_ctx_workarounds_init only
applied to the render engine (since __intel_engine_init_ctx_wa bails out
for other engine classes), yet it seems it's the BCS engine that's
failing to reset with this patch?. If I just I915_WRITE to this
register, won't the value only apply to whichever context is currently
executing on the RCS engine and be lost when other contexts switch in?
Matt
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-16 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-15 21:58 [PATCH] drm/i915/gen11: Add Wa_1604278689:icl,ehl Matt Roper
2019-08-15 22:19 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-15 22:24 ` Matt Roper
2019-08-15 23:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2019-08-16 7:07 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-16 16:29 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2019-08-16 16:38 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-19 16:13 ` [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-08-19 16:46 ` Matt Roper
2019-08-19 18:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Matt Roper
2019-08-19 20:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/gen11: Add Wa_1604278689:icl,ehl (rev2) Patchwork
2019-08-20 5:06 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190816162909.GG832@mdroper-desk.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox