From: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Expand subslice mask
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:03:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190823160307.180813-12-stuart.summers@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190823160307.180813-1-stuart.summers@intel.com>
Currently, the subslice_mask runtime parameter is stored as an
array of subslices per slice. Expand the subslice mask array to
better match what is presented to userspace through the
I915_QUERY_TOPOLOGY_INFO ioctl. The index into this array is
then calculated:
slice * subslice stride + subslice index / 8
v2: Fix 32-bit build
v3: Use new helper function in SSEU workaround warning message
v4: Use GEM_BUG_ON to force developers to use valid SSEU configurations
per platform (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h | 4 +++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 5 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 5 ++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 8 ++++----
5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
index 1505042d7b5d..74f793423231 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
@@ -32,6 +32,20 @@ intel_sseu_subslice_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
return total;
}
+u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
+{
+ int i, offset = slice * sseu->ss_stride;
+ u32 mask = 0;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(slice >= sseu->max_slices);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < sseu->ss_stride; i++)
+ mask |= (u32)sseu->subslice_mask[offset + i] <<
+ i * BITS_PER_BYTE;
+
+ return mask;
+}
+
void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
u32 ss_mask)
{
@@ -43,7 +57,7 @@ void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
unsigned int
intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
{
- return hweight8(sseu->subslice_mask[slice]);
+ return hweight32(intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, slice));
}
u32 intel_sseu_make_rpcs(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
index 7703d75f2da3..4070f6ff1db6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
struct sseu_dev_info {
u8 slice_mask;
- u8 subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES];
+ u8 subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE];
u16 eu_total;
u8 eu_per_subslice;
u8 min_eu_in_pool;
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ intel_sseu_subslice_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu);
unsigned int
intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
+u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
+
void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
u32 ss_mask);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index 126ab3667919..ad2261e0cba8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -801,11 +801,10 @@ wa_init_mcr(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
}
slice = fls(sseu->slice_mask) - 1;
- GEM_BUG_ON(slice >= ARRAY_SIZE(sseu->subslice_mask));
- subslice = fls(l3_en & sseu->subslice_mask[slice]);
+ subslice = fls(l3_en & intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, slice));
if (!subslice) {
DRM_WARN("No common index found between subslice mask %x and L3 bank mask %x!\n",
- sseu->subslice_mask[slice], l3_en);
+ intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, slice), l3_en);
subslice = fls(l3_en);
WARN_ON(!subslice);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index ba93194752c0..54f02718effb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -3860,13 +3860,16 @@ static void gen9_sseu_device_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
for (ss = 0; ss < info->sseu.max_subslices; ss++) {
unsigned int eu_cnt;
+ u8 ss_idx = s * info->sseu.ss_stride +
+ ss / BITS_PER_BYTE;
if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
if (!(s_reg[s] & (GEN9_PGCTL_SS_ACK(ss))))
/* skip disabled subslice */
continue;
- sseu->subslice_mask[s] |= BIT(ss);
+ sseu->subslice_mask[ss_idx] |=
+ BIT(ss % BITS_PER_BYTE);
}
eu_cnt = 2 * hweight32(eu_reg[2*s + ss/2] &
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index c20f74ee5f22..d9b5baaef5d0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ static void sseu_dump(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, struct drm_printer *p)
hweight8(sseu->slice_mask), sseu->slice_mask);
drm_printf(p, "subslice total: %u\n", intel_sseu_subslice_total(sseu));
for (s = 0; s < sseu->max_slices; s++) {
- drm_printf(p, "slice%d: %u subslices, mask=%04x\n",
+ drm_printf(p, "slice%d: %u subslices, mask=%08x\n",
s, intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(sseu, s),
- sseu->subslice_mask[s]);
+ intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, s));
}
drm_printf(p, "EU total: %u\n", sseu->eu_total);
drm_printf(p, "EU per subslice: %u\n", sseu->eu_per_subslice);
@@ -159,9 +159,9 @@ void intel_device_info_dump_topology(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
}
for (s = 0; s < sseu->max_slices; s++) {
- drm_printf(p, "slice%d: %u subslice(s) (0x%hhx):\n",
+ drm_printf(p, "slice%d: %u subslice(s) (0x%08x):\n",
s, intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(sseu, s),
- sseu->subslice_mask[s]);
+ intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, s));
for (ss = 0; ss < sseu->max_subslices; ss++) {
u16 enabled_eus = sseu_get_eus(sseu, s, ss);
--
2.22.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-23 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-23 16:02 [PATCH 00/11] Refactor to expand subslice mask (rev 2) Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:02 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Use variable for debugfs device status Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:02 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Add function to set SSEU info per platform Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:02 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Add subslice stride runtime parameter Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:03 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Add EU " Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:03 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Use local variables for subslice_mask for device info Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:03 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Add function to set subslices Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:03 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Use subslice stride to set subslices for a given slice Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:06 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-23 16:03 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Add function to determine if a slice has a subslice Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:03 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Refactor instdone loops on new subslice functions Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:03 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Add new function to copy subslices for a slice Stuart Summers
2019-08-23 16:03 ` Stuart Summers [this message]
2019-08-23 17:41 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor to expand subslice mask (rev 2) Patchwork
2019-08-23 18:11 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-08-23 18:15 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-24 18:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-08-22 18:32 [PATCH 00/11] " Stuart Summers
2019-08-22 18:32 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Expand subslice mask Stuart Summers
2019-08-20 23:05 [PATCH 00/11] Refactor to expand subslice mask (rev 2) Stuart Summers
2019-08-20 23:05 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Expand subslice mask Stuart Summers
2019-08-21 22:49 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-22 0:01 ` Summers, Stuart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190823160307.180813-12-stuart.summers@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox