Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add sysfs interface to control class-of-service

["Kumar Valsan, Prathap" <prathap.kumar.valsan@intel.com>]

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:50:20PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Quoting Prathap Kumar Valsan (2019-08-26 01:48:01)
> > To provide shared last-level-cache isolation to cpu workloads running
> > concurrently with gpu workloads, the gpu allocation of cache lines needs
> > to be restricted to certain ways. Currently GPU hardware supports four
> > class-of-service(CLOS) levels and there is an associated way-mask for
> > each CLOS.
> > 
> > Hardware supports reading supported way-mask configuration for GPU using
> > a bios pcode interface. The supported way-masks and the one currently
> > active is communicated to userspace via a sysfs file--closctrl. Admin user
> > can then select a new mask by writing the mask value to the file.
> > 
> > Note of Caution: Restricting cache ways using this mechanism presents a
> > larger attack surface for side-channel attacks.
> 
> I wonder if this is enough to justify some further protection before
> enabling?

Should there be a kernel warning message on enabling this or a commit
message is enough?
> 
> > Example usage:
> > The active way-mask is highlighted within square brackets.
> > > cat /sys/class/drm/card0/closctrl
> > [0xffff] 0xff00 0xc000 0x8000
> 
> How about two files for easier scripting interface?
> 
> /sys/class/drm/card0/llc_clos
> /sys/class/drm/card0/llc_clos_modes
>
Agreed. A single file interface was suggested by Jon. Hope he is ok with having
two files :)
> Regards, Joonas
Thanks,
Prathap
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx