public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: ELiminate intel_pipe_to_cpu_transcoder() from assert_fdi_tx()
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:55:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210195527.GC1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd8a68e72804b48a1270877a8d62eeb8c4a08df.camel@intel.com>

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 06:19:24PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 18:38 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Let's start to eliminate intel_pipe_to_cpu_transcoder() so that
> > we can get rid of one more crtc->config usage (which we will want
> > to nuke as well).
> > 
> > In the case of assert_fdi_tx() we know that we're never
> > dealing with the EDP transcoder so we can simply replace
> > this with a cast.
> 
> There still one EDP transcoder case when running in a HSW:
> 
> haswell_crtc_enable()
> 	lpt_pch_enable()
> 		lpt_enable_pch_transcoder()
> 			assert_fdi_tx_enabled()

The transcoder will never EDP. But this casting back and forth 
is a bit ugly. Maybe I should just kill these FDI TX asserts
from the hsw/bdw code...

> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 10 +++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index e7e5497e6f2e..cabd88337822 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -1141,11 +1141,15 @@ static void assert_fdi_tx(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  			  enum pipe pipe, bool state)
> >  {
> >  	bool cur_state;
> > -	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder =
> > intel_pipe_to_cpu_transcoder(dev_priv,
> > -								      p
> > ipe);
> >  
> >  	if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> > -		/* DDI does not have a specific FDI_TX register */
> > +		/*
> > +		 * DDI does not have a specific FDI_TX register.
> > +		 *
> > +		 * FDI is never hooked fed from EDP transcoder
> > +		 * so pipe->transcoder cast is fine here.
> > +		 */
> > +		enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = (enum transcoder)pipe;
> >  		u32 val =
> > I915_READ(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(cpu_transcoder));
> >  		cur_state = !!(val & TRANS_DDI_FUNC_ENABLE);
> >  	} else {

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-10 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-12 16:38 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/fbc: Nuke bogus single pipe fbc1 restriction Ville Syrjala
2019-11-12 16:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala
2019-11-12 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Relocate intel_crtc_active() Ville Syrjala
2019-11-12 16:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala
2019-11-13  6:29   ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-13  6:29     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-12 16:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: ELiminate intel_pipe_to_cpu_transcoder() from assert_fdi_tx() Ville Syrjala
2019-11-12 16:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala
2019-12-10 18:19   ` Souza, Jose
2019-12-10 19:55     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-12-10 20:10       ` Souza, Jose
2019-11-12 16:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Pass cpu transcoder to assert_pipe() Ville Syrjala
2019-11-12 16:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala
2019-12-10 18:23   ` Souza, Jose
2019-12-10 19:58     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-10 20:14       ` Souza, Jose
2019-11-12 21:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/fbc: Nuke bogus single pipe fbc1 restriction Patchwork
2019-11-12 21:45   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-12 22:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-11-12 22:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-13 10:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-11-13 10:24   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191210195527.GC1208@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox