From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 12:10:44 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200108121044.5edb4992@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 795 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
between commit:
ce69e553b9a4 ("drm/i915/gt: Restore coarse power gating")
from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:
90eb7d2aa3ce ("drm/i915: Simplify NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating")
from the drm tree.
I fixed it up (I have no idea about this, so I just used the latter
version) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2020-01-08 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-08 1:10 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-17 1:26 [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-08 3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-07 2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-22 0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08 1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08 2:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-31 0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-31 0:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-08 0:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-08 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200108121044.5edb4992@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox